Cited by 564Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesLabor Law and Work Dynamics

Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?

Stewart, Andrew, Stanford, Jim·2017·The Economic and Labour Relations Review

Abstract

Paid work associated with digital platform businesses (in taxi, delivery, maintenance and other functions) embodies features which complicate the application of traditional labour regulations and employment standards. This article reviews the extent of this type of work in Australia, and its main characteristics. It then considers the applicability of existing employment regulations to these ‘gig’ jobs, citing both Australian and international legislation and case law. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the scope of traditional regulations, minimum standards and remedies in the realm of irregular digitally mediated work. Regulators and policymakers should consider how to strengthen and expand the regulatory framework governing gig work. The article notes five major options in this regard: enforcement of existing laws; clarifying or expanding definitions of ‘employment’; creating a new category of ‘independent worker’; creating rights for ‘workers’, not employees; and reconsidering the concept of an ‘employer’. We review the pros and cons of these approaches and urge regulators to be creative and ambitious in better protecting the minimum standards and conditions of workers in these situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1035304617722461

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gig workers performing on digital labor platforms may lack employment protections such as a minimum wage, overwork, right to collective bargaining, or health insurance or safety support.

    “Gig workers performing on digital labor platforms may lack employment protections such as a minimum wage, overwork, right to collective bargaining, or health insurance or safety support (e.g., Bertolini et al., 2021;Stewart & Stanford, 2017;Sutherland et al., 2020;Wood et al., 2019).”

    From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Stewart & Stanford, 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, A., & Stanford, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Andrew
Venue
The Economic and Labour Relations Review
Published
2017-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
420-437
ISSN
  • 1035-3046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1838-2673
OpenAlex
W2744940739
Cited by
564
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 5
FWCI
74.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic and Labour Relations Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
gig economy, platform work, labor market regulation, employment status, independent contractors, worker classification, employment definition, employer concept, labor standards, labor law enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review