Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?
Abstract
Paid work associated with digital platform businesses (in taxi, delivery, maintenance and other functions) embodies features which complicate the application of traditional labour regulations and employment standards. This article reviews the extent of this type of work in Australia, and its main characteristics. It then considers the applicability of existing employment regulations to these ‘gig’ jobs, citing both Australian and international legislation and case law. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the scope of traditional regulations, minimum standards and remedies in the realm of irregular digitally mediated work. Regulators and policymakers should consider how to strengthen and expand the regulatory framework governing gig work. The article notes five major options in this regard: enforcement of existing laws; clarifying or expanding definitions of ‘employment’; creating a new category of ‘independent worker’; creating rights for ‘workers’, not employees; and reconsidering the concept of an ‘employer’. We review the pros and cons of these approaches and urge regulators to be creative and ambitious in better protecting the minimum standards and conditions of workers in these situations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gig workers performing on digital labor platforms may lack employment protections such as a minimum wage, overwork, right to collective bargaining, or health insurance or safety support.
“Gig workers performing on digital labor platforms may lack employment protections such as a minimum wage, overwork, right to collective bargaining, or health insurance or safety support (e.g., Bertolini et al., 2021;Stewart & Stanford, 2017;Sutherland et al., 2020;Wood et al., 2019).”
From Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research (2024) · cites this paper as Stewart & Stanford, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12258 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
“Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector
Goods, C., Veen, A., & Barratt, T. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Relations · doi:10.1177/0022185618817069 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis
Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future research
Wu, D., & Huang, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2775 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Job quality, fair work and gig work: the lived experience of gig workers
Myhill, K., Richards, J., & Sang, K. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1867612 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The winners and the losers of the platform economy: who participates?
Hoang, L., Blank, G., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1720771 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Ishizaka, A., Gupta, M., & Shankar, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.023 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stewart, A., & Stanford, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Stewart, Andrew
- Venue
- The Economic and Labour Relations Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 420-437
- ISSN
- 1035-3046 (ISSN-L)
- 1838-2673
- OpenAlex
- W2744940739
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 74.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Economic and Labour Relations Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
- Keywords
- gig economy, platform work, labor market regulation, employment status, independent contractors, worker classification, employment definition, employer concept, labor standards, labor law enforcement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review