Cited by 13Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Effectiveness of a 10-week group program based on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy skills among patients with personality and mood disorders: findings from a pilot study

Conrad, Agatha M, Sankaranarayanan, Anoop, Lewin, Terry J, Dunbar, Anna·2017·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Community mental health services are often required to manage people experiencing repeated crises. Personality disorders are not uncommon, accounting for up to one-third of such presentations. These patients are often difficult to treat, leading to a revolving-door phenomenon. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a pilot intervention in reducing psychological symptoms and distress, and examined the impact of the intervention on mental health service utilization. Methods: A pre- versus post-treatment evaluation was conducted of the effectiveness of a 10-week group psychological intervention based on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy skills, conducted in a regional Australian community mental health service with patients diagnosed with either Cluster B personality disorder or a mood disorder. Results: Of those who completed the program ( N = 38 patients), 84% were female, with an average age of 35.13 years. Participants were active clients of the service for an average of 58.3 weeks prior to the program. They demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life and self-control, and a reduction in hopelessness, cognitive instability and dependence on mental health services. Conclusions: Limiting the Dialectical Behaviour Therapy program to a short-term skills-based group component was successful with the targeted patient group; however, more research is required to establish the generalizability of these results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856217707393

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, A. M., Sankaranarayanan, A., Lewin, T. J., & Dunbar, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Clinical Nurse Consultant, Hunter Valley Mental Health Service, Hunter New England Mental Health, Maitland, NSW, Australia
Corresponding author
Conrad, Agatha M
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2017-06-26
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
466-470
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2697136936
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, group therapy, personality disorders, mood disorders, cluster B personality disorders, community mental health services, revolving door, psychological distress, quality of life, self-control, hopelessness, mental health service utilization, skills-based intervention
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personality Disorders, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review