Cultural Humility: A Concept Analysis
Abstract
Diversity is being increasingly recognized as an area of emphasis in health care. The term cultural humility is used frequently but society’s understanding of the term is unclear. The aim of this article was to provide a concept analysis and a current definition for the term cultural humility. Cultural humility was used in a variety of contexts from individuals having ethnic and racial differences, to differences in sexual preference, social status, interprofessional roles, to health care provider/patient relationships. The attributes were openness, self-awareness, egoless, supportive interactions, and self-reflection and critique. The antecedents were diversity and power imbalance. The consequences were mutual empowerment, partnerships, respect, optimal care, and lifelong learning. Cultural humility was described as a lifelong process. With a firm understanding of the term, individuals and communities will be better equipped to understand and accomplish an inclusive environment with mutual benefit and optimal care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The multicultural orientation framework: A narrative review.
Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C., Owen, J., Hook, J. N., Rivera, D. P., Choe, E., Van Tongeren, D. R., Worthington, E. L., & Placeres, V. (2018) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/pst0000160 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Woods-Jaeger, B. A., Kava, C. M., Akiba, C. F., Lucid, L., & Dorsey, S. (2017) · Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy · doi:10.1037/tra0000170 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lea, C. H., Salazar, M. E., Huerta, A. H., Sardesai, T., & Edwards, K. T. (2025) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2025.2503301 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions
Cortese, S., Arango, C., Aymerich, C., Catalan, A., Chetouani, M., Cohen, D., Coghill, D., Gabellone, A., Iniesta, R., Kadan, A., et al. (2026) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.70044 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Foronda, C., Baptiste, D.-L., Reinholdt, M. M., & Ousman, K.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Foronda, Cynthia
- Venue
- Journal of Transcultural Nursing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-06-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-217
- ISSN
- 1043-6596 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7832
- OpenAlex
- W2224734195
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 95 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 64.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Transcultural Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National League for Nursing
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
- Keywords
- cultural humility, conceptual analysis, diversity in health care, power imbalance, healthcare provider-patient relationship, self-awareness, self-reflection, mutual empowerment, interprofessional relations, sexual orientation differences, inclusive healthcare
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Ego, Humans, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Transcultural Nursing, Cultural Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review