Cited by 37Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationCultural Competency in Health CareEmergency and Acute Care Studies

The impact of cultural embeddedness on the implementation of an artificial intelligence program at triage: a qualitative study

Jordan, Michael, Hauser, Jacob, Cota, Stephanie, Li, Hong, Wolf, Lisa·2023·Journal of Transcultural Nursing

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Triage requires rapid determination of acuity and resources. Current modalities allow for individual judgment, with varied application of algorithmic rules. Although artificial intelligence can improve triage accuracy, gaps remain in understanding implementation facilitators and barriers, especially those related to the cultural understandings by nurses of emergency department presentations. The purpose of this study was to explore the cultural and technological elements of the implementation of an artificial intelligence clinical decision support aid (i.e., KATE) in an emergency nursing triage process in an urban community hospital on the West Coast of the United States. METHOD: An exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured small group and individual interviews and constant comparison analysis strategies. The sample comprised 13 emergency department triage nurses at one site. Campinha-Bacote's theory of cultural competence framed the study. RESULTS: . Participants reported reliance on clinical experience and cultural knowledge to assign acuity. DISCUSSION: The implementation of an artificial intelligence program was initially received skeptically due to the acontextual nature of AI, but grew to be perceived as a safety net for triage decision making among emergency nurses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10436596221129226

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordan, M., Hauser, J., Cota, S., Li, H., & Wolf, L.
Affiliations
  • White Memorial Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Azusa Pacific University (US)
  • Emergency Nurses Association (US)
Venue
Journal of Transcultural Nursing
Published
2022-10-08
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
32-39
ISSN
  • 1043-6596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7832
OpenAlex
W4303647070
Cited by
37
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Transcultural Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence, emergency department triage, clinical decision support, Kate, cultural competence, implementation barriers and facilitators, emergency nursing, acuity assessment
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Triage, Emergency Nursing, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review