The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Damage Identification in Aging Aircraft Structures with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors
Abstract
Piezoelectric wafer active sensors can be applied to aging aircraft structures to monitor the onset and progress of structural damage such as fatigue cracks and corrosion. Two main detection strategies are considered: (a) the wave propagation method for far-field damage detection; and (b) the electro-mechanical (E/M) impedance method for near-field damage detection. These methods are developed and verified on simple-geometry specimens, and then tested on realistic aging-aircraft panels with seeded cracks and corrosion. The specimens instrumentation with piezoelectric-wafer active sensors and ancillary apparatus is presented. The experimental methods, signal processing, and damage detection algorithms, tuned to the specific method used for structural interrogation, are discussed. In the wave propagation approach, the pulse-echo and acousto-ultrasonic methods were considered. Reflections from seeded cracks were successfully recorded. In addition, acoustic emission and low-velocity impact were also detected. In the E/M impedance method approach, the high-frequency spectrum is processed using overall-statistics damage metrics. The (1- R 2)3 damage metric, where R is the correlation coefficient, was found to yield the best results. The simultaneous use of the E/M impedance method in the near field and of the wave propagation method in the far field opens the way for a comprehensive multifunctional damage detection system for aging aircraft structural health monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Na, W. S., & Baek, J. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18051307 · Cited by 336
Park, G., Farrar, C. R., Scalea, F. L. D., & Coccia, S. (2006) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/020 · Cited by 264
Explainable 1-D convolutional neural network for damage detection using Lamb wave
Pandey, P., Rai, A., & Mitra, M. (2022) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108220 · Cited by 100
Structural Health Monitoring Damage Detection Systems for Aerospace
(2021) · Springer Aerospace Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72192-3 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Giurgiutiu, V., Zagrai, A., & Bao, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 673-687
- ISSN
- 1045-389X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8138
- OpenAlex
- W2134672259
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Damage Identification in Aging Aircraft Structures with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1045389x04038051
- The paper
- Giurgiutiu, V., Zagrai, A., & Bao, J. (2004). Damage Identification in Aging Aircraft Structures with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x04038051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.