The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness
Abstract
This article focuses on the research and scholarship dealing with the assessment of the experiential approach in both its computer-based and human-based forms. It covers two forms of assessment. First it covers explicit attempts to assess the validity of experiential learning, and second it focuses on measuring the effectiveness of the experiential approach. The authors classify the literature on both validity and measurement into critiques and prescriptions for ideal research on one hand and empirical research studies on the other. The empirical research reviewed supports the notion that experiential learning is effective. However, the studies showing these results reflect a long-standing trend of not meeting the highest of research design and measurement standards. Thus, the authors believe any conclusion about the effectiveness of these teaching approaches must be tentative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hebert, E. P., Landin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607925 · Cited by 133
Cited by
Gamification and multimedia for medical education: a landscape review
McCoy, L., Lewis, J. H., & Dalton, D. (2016) · Journal of Osteopathic Medicine · doi:10.7556/jaoa.2016.003 · Cited by 223
Enhancing Student Experiential Learning With Structured Interviews
Cornell, R. M., Johnson, C. B., & Schwartz, W. C. (2013) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2012.659296 · Cited by 49
Bumbach, M. D., Culross, B. A., & Datta, S. K. (2022) · CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000916 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Gosen, J., & Washbush, J.
- Venue
- Simulation & Gaming
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-293
- ISSN
- 1046-8781 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-826X
- OpenAlex
- W2071898788
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1046878104263544
- The paper
- Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. (2004). A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878104263544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.