The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice
Abstract
Experiential learning in the educational context incorporates real-life-based processes into the educational setting in order for them to be used and scrutinized The heart of these sorts of learning experiences is the postexperience analytic process, generally referred to as the debriefing session. This essay focuses on the debriefing process as it accompanies one form of experiential learning, simulations and games. It provides a review of the existent literature on debriefing, an analysis of the debriefing process, and effective strategies for its use. It provides an analysis of the process, identifies its components and essential phases, and presents a systematic approach to the assessment of the conduct of debriefing sessions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dewey, J. (1986) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131728609335764 · Cited by 13,432
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,099
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. S. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,485
Lambert, N. M., Ketzenberger, K. E., & Kemp, C. A. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese0122 · Cited by 2,220
(2015) · Education, Leadership and Islam · doi:10.4324/9780203502297-3 · Cited by 599
The transparency of denial: Briefing in the debriefing paradigm.
Wegner, D. M., Coulton, G. F., & Wenzlaff, R. M. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.338 · Cited by 139
Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: The important role of debriefing.
Smith, S. S., & Richardson, D. R. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1075 · Cited by 100
A Procedure for Explaining Experiments Involving Deception
Mills, J. R. (1976) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/014616727600200102 · Cited by 97
Lederman, L. C. (1984) · Simulation & Games · doi:10.1177/0037550084154002 · Cited by 88
Self-citationEffectiveness of debriefing following deception experiments.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Abrahams, D. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024827 · Cited by 73
Cited by
The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning
Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e3180315539 · Cited by 1,714
Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000072 · Cited by 1,106
Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative
Ziv, A., Wolpe, P. R., Small, S. D., & Glick, S. (2003) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00006 · Cited by 1,008
Establishing a Safe Container for Learning in Simulation: The Role of the Presimulation Briefing
Rudolph, J. W., Raemer, D. B., & Simon, R. (2014) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000047 · Cited by 915
Debriefing as Formative Assessment: Closing Performance Gaps in Medical Education
Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Raemer, D. B., & Eppich, W. J. (2008) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Lederman, L. C.
- Venue
- Simulation & Gaming
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-160
- ISSN
- 1046-8781 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-826X
- OpenAlex
- W2119641248
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1046878192232003
- The paper
- Lederman, L. C. (1992). Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice. Simulation & Gaming. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878192232003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
