The effects of staff training on the types of interactions observed at two group homes for foster care children
Abstract
Objectives: An extensive literature base exists for behavioral parent training; however, few studies have focused on training direct care staff at group home and residential facilities for children. This study was conducted to determine whether a behavioral staff training program consisting of classroom training and in-home feedback would improve staff interactions with children at two group foster care homes. Method: Staff at both homes were trained, and direct observation measures were obtained on positive and negative interactions and lack of interactions. A multiple-baseline design across homes was used to assess staff interaction behavior. Results: Increases in both positive interactions and tool use were observed in the treatment phase, as were decreases in negative interactions for both group homes. Conclusions: The results suggest that training direct care staff, including social workers, to use behavioral strategies change patterns of interaction, resulting in a greater likelihood of improved relationships between staff and children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only a few evaluations of program models for group care settings have reported intervention effects on the quality of relationships between children and staff.
“only a few evaluations of program models for group care settings have reported intervention effects on the quality of relationships between children and staff”
From Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model (2020) · cites this paper as Crosland et al., 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards
Smith, J. D. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0029312 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Improving relationship quality in group care settings: The impact of implementing the CARE model
Izzo, C. V., Smith, E. G., Sellers, D. E., Holden, M. J., & Nunno, M. A. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104623 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Crosland, K. A., Dunlap, G., Sager, W., Neff, B., Wilcox, C., Blanco, A., & Giddings, T.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crosland, Kimberly A.
- Venue
- Research on Social Work Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 410-420
- ISSN
- 1049-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7581
- OpenAlex
- W2012437341
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research on Social Work Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Keywords
- employee training, group homes, foster care, direct care workers, staff-child interaction, positive interactions, negative interactions, behavioral strategies, social workers, residential care for children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review