Cited by 31Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Health care professionals’ and patients’ management of the interactional practices in telemedicine videoconferencing: a conversation analytic and discursive systematic review

Dalley, David, Rahman, Rachel, Ivaldi, Antonia·2021·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Telemedicine has developed as a tool for increasing access to health-related services. However, clinicians are required to achieve effective communication and provide quality care despite the remoteness of patients. The aim of this review was to focus on the interactional components of telemedicine consultations, identifying the social and embodied practices that health care professionals and patients draw on when managing the complexities of videoconferencing technology. A systematic review of telemedicine research using conversation analysis and discursive psychology was conducted, resulting in six articles eligible for inclusion. Interactional practices were synthesized into three categories: positioning utterances, visual and audiological clarification, and directional feedback. These categories demonstrate complex but ordered multimodal interactions that position the technology and health care professional as key to ensuring effective communication. Their interactional relevance highlights a gap in telemedicine research, where the need to focus more on the communicative and clinical richness of these unique consultations is reinforced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732320942346

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalley, D., Rahman, R., & Ivaldi, A.
Affiliations
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Dalley, David
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2020-08-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
804-814
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W3046629435
Cited by
31
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
telemedicine, videoconferencing, teleconsultation, interactional practices, clinician-patient communication, multimodal interaction, embodied practice, discursive psychology, conversation analysis
MeSH terms
Communication, Health Personnel, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Telemedicine, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review