The Socialization of Physicians during Attending Rounds: A Study of Team Learning among Medical Students
Abstract
A participant observation study of teaching during attending rounds, informed by other medical education and medical sociology studies, explored the teamwork patterns learned by medical students and physicians in teaching hospitals. Within clinical medical education, there exists a distinctive authority structure that nurtures competition and collaboration among learners while ensuring reasonable patient care. Following residency training, this structure fades, and there is necessarily greater reliance on the nurses and allied health professionals from whom physicians were relatively isolated during their medical education. Therefore, interdisciplinary clinical education, involving physicians-in-training working collaboratively with other health professionals, seems warranted as preparation for medical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inclusion of other medical professionals in medical rounds would give alternative and broader conceptualisations of patients' needs.
“It is suggested that the inclusion of other medical professionals in the process would give alternative and broader conceptualisations of patients' needs.”
From Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? (2017) · cites this paper as Weinholtz 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786060 · Cited by 1,973 · see citing works
Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us?
Philpott, C., & Oates, C. (2017) · Professional Development in Education · doi:10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weinholtz, D.
- Affiliations
- East Tennessee State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weinholtz, Donn
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-177
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2137930940
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Keywords
- team learning, medical students, clinical teaching, authority structure, teamwork, residency training, teaching hospitals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
