Cited by 21Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchHealthcare Quality and Management

Experience of Services as a Key Outcome in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Care: The Case for a Better Understanding of Patient Experiences

Open access
Foley, Geraldine, Timonen, Virpi, Hardiman, Orla·2012·American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Abstract

People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) frequently express dissatisfaction with services. Patient satisfaction with services in ALS care is not always measured and service user perspectives are not usually included when evaluating the outcomes of care. There is a lack of consensus on what constitutes satisfaction for patients in ALS care. To date, health care professionals' conceptualization of outcomes in ALS care has excluded measures of patient satisfaction with services. Exploring the context of the ALS service user experience of care will identify a conceptual framework that will include the domains of satisfaction with care for patients with ALS. An instrument that draws on the ALS patient perspective of services, developed on the basis of qualitative investigation, should be used to measure satisfaction with services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049909111423774

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foley, G., Timonen, V., & Hardiman, O.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Foley, Geraldine
Venue
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2011-10-13
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
362-367
ISSN
  • 1049-9091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2715
OpenAlex
W2003600527
Cited by
21
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Trinity College Dublin
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, patient satisfaction, service user experiences, patient outcomes, patient perspectives, conceptual framework, satisfaction measurement instrument, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Health Services Research, Humans, Palliative Care, Patient Care Team, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review