Cited by 35Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareInnovations in Medical Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teaching Medical Students About “The Conversation”: An Interactive Value-Based Advance Care Planning Session

Open access
Lum, Hillary D., Dukes, Joanna, Church, Skotti, Abbott, Jean, Youngwerth, Jean M.·2018·American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) promotes care consistent with patient wishes. Medical education should teach how to initiate value-based ACP conversations. Objective: To develop and evaluate an ACP educational session to teach medical students a value-based ACP process and to encourage students to take personal ACP action steps. Design: Groups of third-year medical students participated in a 75-minute session using personal reflection and discussion framed by The Conversation Starter Kit. The Conversation Project is a free resource designed to help individuals and families express their wishes for end-of-life care. Setting and Participants: One hundred twenty-seven US third-year medical students participated in the session. Measurements: Student evaluations immediately after the session and 1 month later via electronic survey. Results: More than 90% of students positively evaluated the educational value of the session, including rating highly the opportunities to reflect on their own ACP and to use The Conversation Starter Kit. Many students (65%) reported prior ACP conversations. After the session, 73% reported plans to discuss ACP, 91% had thought about preferences for future medical care, and 39% had chosen a medical decision maker. Only a minority had completed an advance directive (14%) or talked with their health-care provider (1%). One month later, there was no evidence that the session increased students’ actions regarding these same ACP action steps. Conclusion: A value-based ACP educational session using The Conversation Starter Kit successfully engaged medical students in learning about ACP conversations, both professionally and personally. This session may help students initiate conversations for themselves and their patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049909117696245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901 · DOI
  2. 10.1001/jama.300.14.1665 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.11.010 · DOI
  6. 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008 · DOI
  7. 10.1186/1472-684X-11-15 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/1049909114541513 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000649 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00015 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00001888-200305000-00019 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000271 · DOI
  13. 10.1089/jpm.2013.0039 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s13187-010-0146-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/10401331003656678 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00006 · DOI
  17. 10.1186/s12889-015-1575-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lum, H. D., Dukes, J., Church, S., Abbott, J., & Youngwerth, J. M.
Affiliations
  • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Lum, Hillary D.
Venue
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2017-03-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
324-329
ISSN
  • 1049-9091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2715
OpenAlex
W2767770758
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K76AG054782)
  • University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
advance care planning, medical students, end-of-life care, value-based care, advance directives, self-reflection, physician-patient communication, palliative care education
MeSH terms
Communication, Education, Medical, Humans, Terminal Care, Advance Directives, Advance Care Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review