The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching Medical Students About “The Conversation”: An Interactive Value-Based Advance Care Planning Session
Open accessAbstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) promotes care consistent with patient wishes. Medical education should teach how to initiate value-based ACP conversations. Objective: To develop and evaluate an ACP educational session to teach medical students a value-based ACP process and to encourage students to take personal ACP action steps. Design: Groups of third-year medical students participated in a 75-minute session using personal reflection and discussion framed by The Conversation Starter Kit. The Conversation Project is a free resource designed to help individuals and families express their wishes for end-of-life care. Setting and Participants: One hundred twenty-seven US third-year medical students participated in the session. Measurements: Student evaluations immediately after the session and 1 month later via electronic survey. Results: More than 90% of students positively evaluated the educational value of the session, including rating highly the opportunities to reflect on their own ACP and to use The Conversation Starter Kit. Many students (65%) reported prior ACP conversations. After the session, 73% reported plans to discuss ACP, 91% had thought about preferences for future medical care, and 39% had chosen a medical decision maker. Only a minority had completed an advance directive (14%) or talked with their health-care provider (1%). One month later, there was no evidence that the session increased students’ actions regarding these same ACP action steps. Conclusion: A value-based ACP educational session using The Conversation Starter Kit successfully engaged medical students in learning about ACP conversations, both professionally and personally. This session may help students initiate conversations for themselves and their patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In summary, there is limited interventional study on training healthcare professionals from hospital settings as ACP facilitators, but there is a great demand for it [3, 22].”
From A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lum et al. [22] found that 90% of participants evaluated the educational value of the session positively.”
From A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, there was no evidence that the session increased students’ actions regarding the ACP steps after 1 month.”
From A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The outcome assessors were not blinded to the intervention or exposure status of participants in the studies of Greenberg et al. [20], Jo and An [21], Lum et al. [22], Seal [24], Smith et al. [25] and Wilson et al. [26].”
From A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“All except Lum et al. [22] reported intervention effect maintained at time of follow up.”
From A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs. (2019) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lund, S., Richardson, A., & May, C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116629 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.300.14.1665 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.11.010 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008 · DOI
- 10.1186/1472-684X-11-15 · DOI
- 10.1177/1049909114541513 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000649 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001888-199804000-00015 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001888-200305000-00019 · DOI
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000271 · DOI
- 10.1089/jpm.2013.0039 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13187-010-0146-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/10401331003656678 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001888-200507000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12889-015-1575-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs.
Chan, C. W. H., Ng, N. H. Y., Chan, H. Y. L., Wong, M. M. H., & Chow, K. M. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4192-0 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Lum, H. D., Dukes, J., Church, S., Abbott, J., & Youngwerth, J. M.
- Affiliations
- VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lum, Hillary D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-03-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324-329
- ISSN
- 1049-9091 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2715
- PMC
- PMC5730505
- OpenAlex
- W2767770758
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K76AG054782)
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- advance care planning, medical students, end-of-life care, value-based care, advance directives, self-reflection, physician-patient communication, palliative care education
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Education, Medical, Humans, Terminal Care, Advance Directives, Advance Care Planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review