Cited by 44Language, Communication, and Linguistic StudiesInnovative Education and Learning PracticesLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Activity Theory, Speech Acts, and the ‘‘Doctrine of Infelicity’’: Connecting Language and Technology in Globally Networked Learning Environments

McNair, Lisa D., Paretti, Marie C.·2010·Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Abstract

This article draws on activity theory, politics of the artifact, and speech act theory to analyze how language practices and technology interplay in establishing the social relationships necessary for globally networked teams. Specifically, it uses activity theory to examine how linguistic infelicities and the politics of communication technologies interplay in virtual meetings, thereby demonstrating the importance of grounding professional communication instruction in social as well as technical effectiveness. That is, students must learn not only how to communicate technical concepts clearly and concisely and recognize cultural differences but also how to use language and choose media in ways that produce the social conditions necessary for effective collaboration in globally networked environments. The article analyzes two case studies—a workplace and a classroom—that illustrate how the mediating functions of language and the politics of technology intersect as mediating tools in globally networked activity systems. It then traces the implications of that intersection for professional communication theory and pedagogy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1050651910363275

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNair, L. D., & Paretti, M. C.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
McNair, Lisa D.
Venue
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-04-15
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
323-357
ISSN
  • 0892-5720 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-6519
  • 1552-4574
OpenAlex
W2135920496
Cited by
44
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business and Technical Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
activity theory, speech act theory, virtual meetings, language and technology, media selection, workplace communication, classroom communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review