Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applying the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework to Doctoral Education

McCauley, Kelly Davis, Hinojosa, Amanda S.·2020·Journal of Management Education

Abstract

Doctoral education is inherently stressful for students. While the implications of stress on employees has been heavily investigated within the management literature, what we know about stress has not yet been applied to doctoral education. We take initial steps toward using the stress literature to examine stress in doctoral education by applying the challenge-hindrance stressor framework to the doctoral education context. We briefly define both challenge and hindrance stressors and list common stressors for both related to prototypical learning experiences in doctoral education. Next, we point out that student responses to stress vary because of individual differences, influencing the extent to which students appraise stressors as more hindrance or challenge focused. We also provide rich examples of learning experiences within doctoral education that demonstrate how these experiences incorporate hindrance and challenge stressors. Through these examples, we illustrate how educators can design major learning experiences in doctoral education to address (or at least minimize) hindrance stressors and integrate more challenge stressors. Last, we provide theory-driven recommendations for doctoral educators to capitalize on the positive effects of challenge stressors, and we discuss ways to establish a future research agenda to empirically test the challenge-hindrance framework in the doctoral education context.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1052562920924072

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Abbas M., Raja U. (2019). Challenge-hindrance stressors and job outcomes: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9535-z · DOI
  2. Ali A., Kohun F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.28945/58 · DOI
  3. Chang E. C. (2002). Optimism–pessimism and stress appraisal: Testing a cognitive interactive model of psychological adjustment in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(5), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020313427884 · DOI
  4. Cornwall J., Mayland E. C., van der Meer J., Spronken-Smith R. A., Tustin C., Blyth P. (2019). Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821 · DOI
  5. Crane M. F., Searle B. J. (2016). Building resilience through exposure to stressors: The effects of challenges versus hindrances. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040064 · DOI
  6. Diversity & Inclusion Theme Committee, 2019, The Diversity and Inclusion Theme Committee Townhall at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston
  7. Edwards B. D., Franco-Watkins A. M., Cullen K. L., Howell J. W., Acuff R. E.Jr. (2014). Unifying the challenge-hindrance and sociocognitive models of stress. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034730 · DOI
  8. El-Ghoroury N. H., Galper D. I., Sawaqdeh A, Bufka L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gardner S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0075 · DOI
  10. Hargrove M. B., Nelson D. L., Cooper C. L. (2013). Generating eustress by challenging employees: Helping people savor their work. Organizational Dynamics, 42(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.12.008 · DOI
  11. Jerusalem M., 1992, Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, 195
  12. Kim M., Beehr T. A. (2018). Challenge and hindrance demands lead to employees’ health and behaviours through intrinsic motivation. Stress and Health, 34(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2796 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/10183-003 · DOI
  14. LePine J. A., LePine M. A., Jackson C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 883-891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883 · DOI
  15. LePine M. A., Zhang Y., Crawford E. R., Rich B. L. (2016). Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1036-1059. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778 · DOI · Paper page
  16. McCauley C. D., Ruderman M. N., Ohlott P. J., Morrow J. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.544 · DOI
  17. Mikolajczak M., Luminet O. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1445-1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Offstein E. H., Larson M. B., McNeill A. L., Mwale H. M. (2004). Are we doing enough for today’s graduate students? International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410563103 · DOI
  19. Peacock E. J., Wong P. T. P. (1996). Anticipatory stress: The relation of locus of control, optimism, and control appraisals to coping. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0014 · DOI
  20. Peltonen J., Vekkaila J., Rautio P., Haverinen K., Pyhältö K. (2017). Doctoral students’ social support profiles and their relationship to burnout, drop-out intentions, and time to candidacy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.28945/3792 · DOI
  21. Podsakoff N. P. (2007). Challenge and hindrance stressors in the workplace: Tests of linear, curvilinear, and moderated relationships with employee strains, satisfaction, and performance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
  22. Prem R., Ohly S., Kubicek B., Korunka C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2115 · DOI
  23. Pyhältö K., Toom A., Stubb J., Lonka K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network, 2012, Article 934941. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941 · DOI
  24. Rector N. A., Roger D. (1997). The stress buffering effects of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 799-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00095-0 · DOI
  25. Robertson M. J. (2017). Ages and career stages: Considerations in providing support for mid-late career stage doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1355261 · DOI
  26. Rodell J. B., Judge T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438-1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752 · DOI
  27. Sacramento C. A., Fay D., West M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008 · DOI
  28. Schneider T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 795-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005 · DOI
  29. Selye H., 1976, Stress in health and disease
  30. Selye H., 1976, The stress of life
  31. 10.1002/9780470682357.ch6 · DOI
  32. 10.4135/9781446212752.n4 · DOI
  33. Smith R. L., Maroney K., Nelson K. W., Abel A. L., Abel H. S. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 45(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2006.tb00002.x · DOI
  34. Volkert D., Candela L., Bernacki M. (2018, February). Student motivation, stressors, and intent to leave nursing doctoral study: A national study using path analysis. Nurse Education Today, 61(February), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.033 · DOI
  35. Wallace J. C., Edwards B. D., Arnold T., Frazier M. L., Finch D. M. (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013090 · DOI
  36. Webster J. R., Beehr T. A., Love K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McCauley, K. D., & Hinojosa, A. S.
Affiliations
  • West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, USA
  • Howard University School of Business, Washington, DC, USA
Venue
Journal of Management Education
Published
2020-05-26
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
490-507
ISSN
  • 1052-5629
  • 1552-6658
Cited by
18
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review