The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework to Doctoral Education
Abstract
Doctoral education is inherently stressful for students. While the implications of stress on employees has been heavily investigated within the management literature, what we know about stress has not yet been applied to doctoral education. We take initial steps toward using the stress literature to examine stress in doctoral education by applying the challenge-hindrance stressor framework to the doctoral education context. We briefly define both challenge and hindrance stressors and list common stressors for both related to prototypical learning experiences in doctoral education. Next, we point out that student responses to stress vary because of individual differences, influencing the extent to which students appraise stressors as more hindrance or challenge focused. We also provide rich examples of learning experiences within doctoral education that demonstrate how these experiences incorporate hindrance and challenge stressors. Through these examples, we illustrate how educators can design major learning experiences in doctoral education to address (or at least minimize) hindrance stressors and integrate more challenge stressors. Last, we provide theory-driven recommendations for doctoral educators to capitalize on the positive effects of challenge stressors, and we discuss ways to establish a future research agenda to empirically test the challenge-hindrance framework in the doctoral education context.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, doctoral students generally face multiple dilemmas such as difficult coursework, an increasingly competitive academic environment, and low levels of social support, which contribute to a challenging and stressful doctoral phase (McCauley and Hinojosa, 2020).”
From The impostor phenomenon among doctoral students: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as McCauley and Hinojosa, 2020
Citations
Cites
Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803921 · Cited by 2,438
An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 · Cited by 2,154
Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438 · Cited by 1,948
Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis.
Richardson, K. M., & Rothstein, H. R. (2008) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69 · Cited by 1,374
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Abbas M., Raja U. (2019). Challenge-hindrance stressors and job outcomes: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9535-z · DOI
- Ali A., Kohun F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.28945/58 · DOI
- Chang E. C. (2002). Optimism–pessimism and stress appraisal: Testing a cognitive interactive model of psychological adjustment in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(5), 675-690. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020313427884 · DOI
- Cornwall J., Mayland E. C., van der Meer J., Spronken-Smith R. A., Tustin C., Blyth P. (2019). Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821 · DOI
- Crane M. F., Searle B. J. (2016). Building resilience through exposure to stressors: The effects of challenges versus hindrances. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040064 · DOI
- Diversity & Inclusion Theme Committee, 2019, The Diversity and Inclusion Theme Committee Townhall at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting in Boston
- Edwards B. D., Franco-Watkins A. M., Cullen K. L., Howell J. W., Acuff R. E.Jr. (2014). Unifying the challenge-hindrance and sociocognitive models of stress. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034730 · DOI
- El-Ghoroury N. H., Galper D. I., Sawaqdeh A, Bufka L. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768 · DOI · Paper page
- Gardner S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0075 · DOI
- Hargrove M. B., Nelson D. L., Cooper C. L. (2013). Generating eustress by challenging employees: Helping people savor their work. Organizational Dynamics, 42(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.12.008 · DOI
- Jerusalem M., 1992, Self-efficacy: Thought control of action, 195
- Kim M., Beehr T. A. (2018). Challenge and hindrance demands lead to employees’ health and behaviours through intrinsic motivation. Stress and Health, 34(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2796 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/10183-003 · DOI
- LePine J. A., LePine M. A., Jackson C. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 883-891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883 · DOI
- LePine M. A., Zhang Y., Crawford E. R., Rich B. L. (2016). Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1036-1059. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778 · DOI · Paper page
- McCauley C. D., Ruderman M. N., Ohlott P. J., Morrow J. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.544 · DOI
- Mikolajczak M., Luminet O. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1445-1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Offstein E. H., Larson M. B., McNeill A. L., Mwale H. M. (2004). Are we doing enough for today’s graduate students? International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410563103 · DOI
- Peacock E. J., Wong P. T. P. (1996). Anticipatory stress: The relation of locus of control, optimism, and control appraisals to coping. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0014 · DOI
- Peltonen J., Vekkaila J., Rautio P., Haverinen K., Pyhältö K. (2017). Doctoral students’ social support profiles and their relationship to burnout, drop-out intentions, and time to candidacy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.28945/3792 · DOI
- Podsakoff N. P. (2007). Challenge and hindrance stressors in the workplace: Tests of linear, curvilinear, and moderated relationships with employee strains, satisfaction, and performance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
- Prem R., Ohly S., Kubicek B., Korunka C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2115 · DOI
- Pyhältö K., Toom A., Stubb J., Lonka K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Network, 2012, Article 934941. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941 · DOI
- Rector N. A., Roger D. (1997). The stress buffering effects of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 799-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00095-0 · DOI
- Robertson M. J. (2017). Ages and career stages: Considerations in providing support for mid-late career stage doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1355261 · DOI
- Rodell J. B., Judge T. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438-1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752 · DOI
- Sacramento C. A., Fay D., West M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008 · DOI
- Schneider T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 795-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005 · DOI
- Selye H., 1976, Stress in health and disease
- Selye H., 1976, The stress of life
- 10.1002/9780470682357.ch6 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446212752.n4 · DOI
- Smith R. L., Maroney K., Nelson K. W., Abel A. L., Abel H. S. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 45(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2006.tb00002.x · DOI
- Volkert D., Candela L., Bernacki M. (2018, February). Student motivation, stressors, and intent to leave nursing doctoral study: A national study using path analysis. Nurse Education Today, 61(February), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.033 · DOI
- Wallace J. C., Edwards B. D., Arnold T., Frazier M. L., Finch D. M. (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013090 · DOI
- Webster J. R., Beehr T. A., Love K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impostor phenomenon among doctoral students: a scoping review
Wang, Y., & Li, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233434 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- McCauley, K. D., & Hinojosa, A. S.
- Affiliations
- West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, USA
- Howard University School of Business, Washington, DC, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Management Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-05-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 490-507
- ISSN
- 1052-5629
- 1552-6658
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review