The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lessons from the Best and Worst Student Team Experiences: How a Teacher can make the Difference
Abstract
This study empirically identifies which teacher-controlled (contextual) variables have the greatest impact on whether the student will have a great team experience or a miserable one. The results indicate that the clarity of instructions to the team, the longevity of the team experience, and self-selection of teammates all positively affect team experiences. The level of management education, the team size, and the percentage of the course grade associated with team performance did not differ across best and worst team experiences. Contrary to previous empirical findings and conventional wisdom, the use of peer evaluations was negatively associated with good team experiences. Further insights from the data and implications for the use of student teams are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Cited by
(2004) · Cited by 738
The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects
Lam, C. (2015) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2329490615596417 · Cited by 68
Exploring antecedents of social loafing in students’ group work: A mixed-methods approach
Luo, Z., Marnburg, E., Øgaard, T., & Okumus, F. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100314 · Cited by 32
Brannen, S. F., Beauchamp, D., Cartwright, N., Liddle, D., Tishinsky, J., Newton, G., & Monk, J. (2021) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150205 · Cited by 26
“…this decision on pre-existing friendships and this familiarity is associated with improved communication, cooperation and satisfaction with the outcome of GW (Bacon et al., 1999; Chapman et al., 2006; Hassaskhah & Mozaffari, 2015; Mahenthiran & Rouse, 2000; Mushtaq et al., 2012; Russell, 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-488
- ISSN
- 1052-5629 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6658
- OpenAlex
- W2120767537
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
