The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects
Abstract
This study examines previously untested variables that influence social loafing in professional and technical communication group projects by determining the influence of communication quality and task cohesion on social loafing. A set-up factors model, which included group size, peer review, project scope, and method of team formation, was also tested for means of comparison. The results indicated the communication quality and task cohesion model significantly reduced social loafing, explaining 53% of the variance in social loafing. The model of set-up factors only explained about 4% of the variance. The article discusses instructional strategies that foster quality communication to reduce loafing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Developing evaluative judgement is relevant in online learning environments where social loafing and reduced task visibility can obscure the contributions of individual group members.
“Developing evaluative judgement is relevant in online learning environments where social loafing and reduced task visibility can obscure the contributions of individual group members (Lam, 2015).”
From Exploring the experiences of social loafing in group work among online psychology students (2025) · cites this paper as Lam, 2015
Asynchronous communication has the potential to increase social loafing if peer interaction is not intentionally built-in to the group work experience.
“Consistent with prior findings (e.g., Lam, 2015; Sagayno et al., 2023), asynchronous communication has the potential to increase social loafing, if peer interaction is not intentionally built-in to the group work experience.”
From Exploring the experiences of social loafing in group work among online psychology students (2025) · cites this paper as Lam, 2015
Cites
Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681 · Cited by 2,196 · see citing works
Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2014.2312452 · Cited by 1,901 · see citing works
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
Zaccaro, S. J., Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.2.308 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC ORIGINS OF PERCEIVED SOCIAL LOAFING IN ORGANIZATIONS.
George, J. M. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256478 · Cited by 407 · cited 2× · see citing works
“his or her work is not visible to fellow teammates, he or she may be less inclined to complete the task at all (Karau & Williams, 1993; George, 1992).”
BackgroundBurgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x · Cited by 400 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Quality group discussion (Burgoon et al., 2002).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality-based Communication for Construction Projects
Abbas, A., Choi, M., Seo, J., Cha, S., & Li, H. (2019) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-019-0898-0 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Zamecnik, A., Villa-Torrano, C., Kovanović, V., Grossmann, G., Joksimović, S., Dimitriadis, Y., & Pardo, A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100427 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tumpa, R. J., Skaik, S., Ham, M., & Chaudhry, G. M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159638 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Taking a free ride: How team learning affects social loafing.
Gabelica, C., Mæyer, S. D., & Schippers, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000713 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Other strategies that reduce individual tendencies to loaf include increasing team familiarity and identifiability of individual members and decreasing team size (Erez & Somech, 1996; Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialPimentel, D., Pires, J. S., & Almeida, P. L. (2020) · International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior · doi:10.1108/ijotb-07-2019-0082 · Cited by 33
Exploring antecedents of social loafing in students’ group work: A mixed-methods approach
Luo, Z., Marnburg, E., Øgaard, T., & Okumus, F. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education · doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100314 · Cited by 32
Sun, H., Zhang, L.-Y., & Meng, J. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0301 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Diffusion of responsibility in group work: Social loafing
Tosuntaş, Ş. B. (2020) · Journal of Pedagogical Research · doi:10.33902/jpr.2020465073 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Some studies indicate that instructorcreated groups are fairer and more suitable for real life (Bacon et al., 2001; Blowers, 2003; Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundEngineering Student Experiences of Group Work
Rajabzadeh, A. R., Long, J., Saini, G., & Zeadin, M. G. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12050288 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Menekşe, M., Purzer, Ş., & Heo, D. (2019) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0160-9 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…the gender diversity of team members (e.g., Bear & Woolley, 2011), cultural diversity of team members (e.g., Nathan & Lee, 2013), students’ attitudes toward collaboration (e.g., Ruiz Ulloa & Adams, 2004), and social loafing (e.g., Lam, 2015) could play a significant role on team performances.”
BackgroundTumpa, R., Chaudhry, G., Skaik, S., & Miriam, H. (2023) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2023.100084 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Lam, C., & Wolfe, J. (2022) · Journal of business and technical communication · doi:10.1177/10506519221143111 · Cited by 22
“Of course, these explanatory constructs were not arbitrarily selected; they were included because prior theoretical and empirical research showed that the constructs were correlated with each other (Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSocial loafing in group-based learning: student-created and instructor-created group perspectives
Rajaguru, R., Narendran, R., & Rajesh, G. (2020) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-01-2019-0018 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Student-generated awareness information in a group awareness tool: what does it reveal?
Kwon, K. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09727-7 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“The lack of communication or delayed responses to group messages can make an undesirable atmosphere among students (Lam 2015).”
BackgroundCollege student accounts of coping and social support during COVID-19 impacted learning
Apker, J. (2022) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2022.2051574 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Another suggestion is for instructors to proactively develop alternatives to manage classmate social loafing (Lam, 2015; Wolfe & Powell, 2014, October 13-15).”
BackgroundEffects of discussion representation: comparisons between social and cognitive diagrams
Kwon, K., & Park, S. J. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9412-6 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“In a ‘‘collaborative’’ learning environment, revealing contributions by members encourages more active engagement among students (Kerr and Bruun 1983; Lam 2015).”
BackgroundEffects of founder CEO duality and board size on foreign IPOs’ survival in US markets
Lee, S.-Y., & Ko, E.-J. (2022) · Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society · doi:10.1108/cg-04-2021-0151 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lam, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2018.2870683 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“However, the literature surrounding peer evaluation has actually been quite mixed when examining its efficacy to reduce slacking and promote a more equitable distribution of the work [30], [42], [43].”
BackgroundSelf-citationScrum in Classroom Collaborations: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Friess, E. (2022) · Journal of business and technical communication · doi:10.1177/10506519221121817 · Cited by 11
“…have found that public posting of team member performance (Lount & Wilk, 2014), academic alignment (Pieterse & Thompson, 2010), communication quality (Lam, 2015), team size (Aggarwal & O ’ Brien, 2008; Maiden & Perry, 2011; Pieterse & Thompson, 2010), and project scope (Aggarwal & O ’ Brien, 2008)…”
BackgroundPennington, C., Jones, A., Tzavella, L., Chambers, C., & Button, K. S. (2021) · Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3hzdv · Cited by 11
“The first solution is to initiate a code of conduct which outlines clear expectations of what teamwork entails; consortium members could then agree on responsibilities, tasks, milestones, and credit within initial meetings (Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundZhang, L.-Y., & Sun, H. (2020) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-07-2019-0389 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Exploring Which Agile Principles Students Internalize When Using a Kanban Process Methodology
Saltz, J., & Heckman, R. (2020) · Journal of Information Systems Education · doi:10.62273/wegl9935 · Cited by 10
“…problems, much of the advice to faculty has focused on the idea of educating team members in the fundamentals of team dynamics and communication (Lam, 2015), creating effective student peer evaluations (Jassawalla and Sashittal, 2017), and improving the process of assigning students to teams…”
BackgroundTumpa, R., Skaik, S., Ham, M., & Chaudhry, G. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159679 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Dude, that Sucks”: Examining Scrum’s Influence on Empathy in Student Teams
Friess, E., & Lam, C. (2020) · Technical Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10572252.2020.1803413 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Furthermore, previous studies have found that while students routinely view group work negatively (Pope-Ruark, Eichel, Talbott, & Thornton, 2011; Smith et al., 2011), students who work in Scrum sprints attribute Scrum practices to successful collaborations (Pope-Ruark, 2012, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrediktor Social Loafing dalam Konteks Pengerjaan Tugas Kelompok pada Mahasiswa
Fitriana, H., & Saloom, G. (2018) · INSAN Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental · doi:10.20473/jpkm.v3i12018.13-22 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Increasing Student Interaction in Technical Writing Courses in Online Environments
Virtue, D. (2017) · doi:10.1177/2329490617689880 · Cited by 9
Pimentel, D., Almeida, P., & Morais, Y. (2024) · Journal of Family Business Management · doi:10.1108/jfbm-10-2024-0241 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Brasser, M., Frühholz, S., Schneeberger, A. R., Ruschetti, G. G., Schaerli, R., Häner, M., & Studer-Luethi, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866613 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Follow the Leader? The Impact of Leader Rapport Management on Social Loafing
Lam, C., & Campbell, K. S. (2021) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906211020427 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“, transformational or empowering) leadership has been recognized as a key antecedent of group effectiveness in the long term (Campbell & Lam, 2019; Carson et al., 2007; Dulebohn et al., 2012; Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationA Decade of Business and Professional Communication Quarterly : A PRISMA Guided Systematic Review
Sharma, D., Pandey, H., Khandelwal, V., & Walker, R. C. (2024) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906241299589 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Teams That Innovate: The Language of Difference-Driven Inquiry at the Workplace
Moreau, C. (2020) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2329490620949864 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
An analysis of design process and performance in distributed data science teams
McComb, C., Defranco, J., & Maier, T. (2019) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.31224/osf.io/fwrqj · Cited by 7
Say No to Free Riding: Student Perspective on Mechanisms to Reduce Social Loafing in Group Projects
Samarakoon, U., Imbulpitiya, A., & Manathunga, K. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0010449701980206 · Cited by 5
“Lam (2015) determined the influence of communication quality and task cohesion on social loafing.”
BackgroundManagerial Solutions that Increase the Effect of Group Synergy and Reduce Social Loafing
Jolita, V., & Justina, B. (2017) · Management of Organizations Systematic Research · doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0019 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Status of Organizational Justice Dimensions: Evidence from Banks and Insurance Companies
Parajuli, D., & Shrestha, P. (2024) · The Batuk · doi:10.3126/batuk.v10i2.68149 · Cited by 4
“In today's workplace, organizational justice has garnered much attention due to its association with desired employee behavioral 18 THE BATUK : A Peer Reviewed Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 10 Issue No.2 July 2024 outcomes (Shrestha, 2019, 2016a; 2015).”
BackgroundFeuer, M., & Wolfe, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2022.3228020 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“TPC teachers have long advocated the use of charters when working with student teams [7], [8], [30].”
BackgroundChen, H.-J., & Chang, W.-T. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101836 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Effects of Organizational Justice on Social Loafing: The Mediating Role of Felt Obligation
Awee, A., Maludin, N. B., Mohsin, F. H., Raman, G., & Tazilah, M. D. A. K. (2024) · Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business · doi:10.17687/jeb.v12i1.1191 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A distributed perspective to the community-of-inquiry framework for distance education
Biccard, P. (2022) · Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2022.2114826 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In other studies (cf., Cleveland-Innes & Campbell, 2012; Lam, 2015; Russo & Benson, 2005) affective, emotional and autonomy presences have been proposed as additions to complement or advance the CoI framework; however, the call for learning or learner presence to be added seems to be most…”
The Effectiveness of Group Cohesiveness Training in Reducing Social Loafing
Lamanepa, R. K., Keraf, M. K. P. A., & Wijaya, R. P. C. (2021) · Journal of Health and Behavioral Science · doi:10.35508/jhbs.v3i2.3801 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Lam (2015) suggests that one way to reduce social loafing is to increase the quality of communication and the cohesion of tasks.”
BackgroundDesigning Improved Teams for Crowdsourced Competitions
McComb, C., & Maier, T. (2018) · Volume 7: 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology · doi:10.1115/detc2018-85457 · Cited by 3
Can slack curb slacking?: Examining the importance of team communication in reducing social loafing
Lam, C. (2016) · International Professional Communication Conference · doi:10.1109/ipcc.2016.7740502 · Cited by 3
“The 19 students who used Slack will be compared against a previously published study that examined a data set of 445 students [8].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationKirchner, M. J., & London, M. B. (2021) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2021.1915235 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Each challenge can be addressed by instructors through articulating how the assignment will be graded, the use of peer evaluations, and requirement to use a discussion forum to track each members’ participation (Perron 2011; Stevens 2007).”
BackgroundDevelopment Perspectives of the Social Group Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing
Vveinhardt, J., & Banikonytė, J. (2017) · Management of Organizations Systematic Research · doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0011 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Idle Minds: The Role of Social Loafing in Human-AI Teams
Elshan, E., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G., Ebel, P., & Siemon, D. (2025) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2025.016 · Cited by 2
“Individuals often choose to fail at a task instead of exerting additional effort to carry the load of a less-engaged peer (Lam, 2015).”
Exploring the experiences of social loafing in group work among online psychology students
Puccini, O., & Newell, S. (2025) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/dqvkp589 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Consistent with prior findings (e.g., Lam, 2015; Sagayno et al., 2023), asynchronous communication has the potential to increase social loafing, if peer interaction is not intentionally built-in to the group work experience.”
InfluentialÜzülmez, M., Sucu, M., Ayvaz, E. E., & Erşen, D. (2026) · Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-02635-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Furthermore, foster - ing open communication and carefully designing shared reward systems can enhance collaboration, provided they do not encourage minimal effort (Lam 2015; Pearsall et al. 2010).”
Zighan, S., & Aburub, F. (2026) · International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-01-2025-0028 · Cited by 1
Jaiswal, A., Thomas, P. J., Jaiswal, P., Vhaduri, S., & Rodenbeck, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education Conference · doi:10.1109/fie63693.2025.11328562 · Cited by 1
Visualizing Frequent Peer Assessment Results to Uncover Problems in Team Dynamics
Yu, L., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) · doi:10.1109/cseet66350.2025.00045 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…of others while not contributing oneself) [7] and social loafing (doing less work in a team setting than one would otherwise do on one’s own) [8] have been identified as two common factors capable of undermining a team’s effectiveness and leading to negative experiences for team members [9].”
Exploring Mismatches in Self-Others’ Perceptions of Effort in Videoconferencing
Kamada, K., Takahashi, M., & Yamashita, N. (2025) · CHI Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719687 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Empirical studies have reported that there is a negative relationship between perceived loafing and group outcomes such as individual effort, group cohesion, group affective tone, or group members’ satisfaction [2, 3, 14, 17, 25, 33, 40].”
Adapting to Another “New Normal”: The Pandemic’s Impact on Generation Z’s Team Dynamics
Steiner, S. D., Liou, R.-S., & Faifman, L. (2024) · American Journal of Management · doi:10.33423/ajm.v24i2.7158 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In educational settings, low interpersonal cohesiveness can cause uneven work efforts (including social loafing) and resentment, undermining performance quality and student learning outcomes (Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundHarry, M. P. (2023) · Journal of Higher Education Athletics & Innovation · doi:10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2022.1.10.68-89 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Similarly, group work can provide practical applications of course concepts and enable students to engage in more practical experiences prior to entering the job market (Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundSocial Loafing on Empoyees: The Influences of Individual Level and Group Level Factors
Wahyuni, S. F., Arfah, T., Rustham, A. T. P., & Soharto, P. C. (2022) · JURNAL MANAJEMEN BISNIS · doi:10.33096/jmb.v9i1.135 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This is in line with Lam (2015) ’ s study that stated the quality of communication and cohesiveness in finishing group task significantly decrease social loafing by 53%.”
BackgroundResultInvestigating the Effective Factors on Social Loafing in Sports Leisure Time of University Students
Naeimi, H., & Azimkhani, A. (2022) · Humanistic Approach to Sport and Exercise Studies (HASES) · doi:10.52547/hases.2.1.166 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In other words, if a person knows that his individual performance is visible in the group, he will try harder (Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundA Distributed Perspective on the Community-of-Inquiry Framework for Distance EducationPreprint
Biccard, P. (2021) · doi:10.25159/unisarxiv/000009.v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Huang, J., & Hu, C. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2711018
Cong, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1745663
“Social loafing occurs when an individual’s contribution to a group effort diminishes due to low motivation, thus impacting both work performance and learning performance (Lam, 2015; Piezon and Donaldson, 2005).”
Katili, N., Nurdin, M., & Kusuma, P. (2026) · ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin · doi:10.56799/jim.v5i7.17593
Hubungan antara Self Esteem dengan Social Loafing pada Mahasiswa di Kota Bekasi
Widyaningrum, M., Abdillah, R., & Yuliana, Y. V. (2026) · Studia : Journal of Humanities and Education Studies · doi:10.66749/ftn8tk12
“Kelompok dengan jumlah besar pun ikut serta dalam meningkatkan social loafing di mana anggota kelompok mungkin menganggap bahwa orang lain akan menangani beban kerja (Lam, 2015), sehingga mengurangi motivasi pribadi.”
Seherrie, A. C. (2026) · Studies in Learning and Teaching · doi:10.46627/silet.v7i1.779
“In addition, social cohesion and learners' engagement in a safe space significantly improve communication quality and positively influence task performance (Lam, 2015; Riisla et al., 2021).”
Synchronous collaborative software for online group work: A study of student perception
Lambert, J. R., Brown, L. W., Barua, M., & Tengesdal, M. (2026) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2025.2603900
“Improved communication among students group members also strengthens cohesion, which can reduce social loafing (Lam, 2015).”
Ellis, S., & Swindle, T. (2020) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2020.000269.1
“This is consistent with previous studies which describe how instructors ’ failure to clearly communicate student expectations compounds the effects of social loafing in groups and leads to greater student dissatisfaction (Hall and Buzwell, 2013; Lam, 2015).”
BackgroundResultGalin, J. R., Swartz, H., Gleyzer, M., Copley, R. M., & Marino, N. (2018) · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2808-1.ch011
- Authors
- Lam, C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lam, Chris
- ORCID
- Lam, Chris
- Venue
- Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-30
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 454-475
- ISSN
- 2329-4906 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-4922
- OpenAlex
- W2275660073
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Business and Professional Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Keywords
- social loafing, group projects, communication quality, task cohesion, group size, peer review, project scope, team formation, teaching methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review