Cited by 68Team Dynamics and PerformanceInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsProblem and Project Based Learning

The Role of Communication and Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing in Group Projects

Lam, Chris·2015·Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Abstract

This study examines previously untested variables that influence social loafing in professional and technical communication group projects by determining the influence of communication quality and task cohesion on social loafing. A set-up factors model, which included group size, peer review, project scope, and method of team formation, was also tested for means of comparison. The results indicated the communication quality and task cohesion model significantly reduced social loafing, explaining 53% of the variance in social loafing. The model of set-up factors only explained about 4% of the variance. The article discusses instructional strategies that foster quality communication to reduce loafing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2329490615596417

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developing evaluative judgement is relevant in online learning environments where social loafing and reduced task visibility can obscure the contributions of individual group members.

    “Developing evaluative judgement is relevant in online learning environments where social loafing and reduced task visibility can obscure the contributions of individual group members (Lam, 2015).”
  • Asynchronous communication has the potential to increase social loafing if peer interaction is not intentionally built-in to the group work experience.

    “Consistent with prior findings (e.g., Lam, 2015; Sagayno et al., 2023), asynchronous communication has the potential to increase social loafing, if peer interaction is not intentionally built-in to the group work experience.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lam, C.
Affiliations
University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Lam, Chris
Venue
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-07-30
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
454-475
ISSN
  • 2329-4906 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-4922
OpenAlex
W2275660073
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
social loafing, group projects, communication quality, task cohesion, group size, peer review, project scope, team formation, teaching methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review