The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Model for Making Decisions About Text Adaptations
Abstract
Text adaptations have a significant impact on a student's success in the general education classroom. This article examines a process for teachers to use when deciding whether or not to adapt a particular text for an individual student. The following five options for text adaptations are described: (a) bypass reading, (b) decrease reading, (c) support reading, (d) organize reading, and (e) guide reading. Text adaptation is a strategy that should be considered in a variety of settings for students with disabilities and their nondisabled peers, from the prereferral stage in the general education classroom to the continuum of placements available through special education services.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But rather, it reduces the readability demands by eliminating linguistic characteristics that get in the way of comprehension (Dyck & Pemberton, 2002).”
From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Dyck & Pemberton, 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1177/074193258800900109 · DOI
- Bormuth, J.R., 1968, Elementary English, 45, 429
- Dyck, N., 1999, How to adapt text for struggling readers
- Dyck, N., 1997, A dozen tools for paras
- Graves, M.F., 1991, Reading Research Quarterly, 112
- 10.1177/074193259401500606 · DOI
- 10.1080/09362839109524764 · DOI
- 10.1080/10862969109547744 · DOI
- 10.1177/105345129102700204 · DOI
- 10.1177/074193259801900205 · DOI
- Sundbye, N., 1998, Teaching and testing story understanding through goal structure mapping
- Wood, J.W., 1997, Adapting instruction: Accommodating students in inclusive classrooms
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Differentiating Instruction for Disabled Students in Inclusive Classrooms
Broderick, A., Mehta-Parekh, H., & Reid, D. (2005) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4403_3 · Cited by 152
“Dyck and Pemberton (2002) also suggested bypassing reading altogether (if the objective does not require decoding skills), using alternative text with similar content, placing aids within texts to promote comprehension, supporting reading with graphic organizers, or guiding the reading by…”
BackgroundTechnology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda
Edyburn, D. (2007) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.42.1.7 · Cited by 82
Understanding How Adolescents with Reading Difficulties Utilize Technology-Based Tools
Marino, M. T. (2009) · Exceptionality · doi:10.1080/09362830902805848 · Cited by 60
Simplifying informational text structure for struggling readers
Arfé, B., Masón, L., & Fajardo, I. (2017) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9785-6 · Cited by 59
“Some authors prefer the expression text adaptation or elaboration to refer to these latter operations (Crossley et al., 2012; Dyck & Pemberton, 2002; Fajardo et al., 2013) since, in this case, the text re-writing often involves additions of linguistic information (e.g. connectives, topic sentences)…”
Bouck, E. C. (2008) · Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470804300303 · Cited by 19
“Dyck and Pemberton (2002) claimed that textbooks represent a central feature of curricula, particularly at the higher grades.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dyck, N., & Pemberton, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Inc., in Lawrence, Kansas
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pemberton, Jane B.
- Venue
- Intervention in School and Clinic
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-35
- ISSN
- 0001-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1053-4512
- 1538-4810
- OpenAlex
- W2087587246
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intervention in School and Clinic (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- textual adaptation, decision-making, students with disabilities, general education classrooms, reading support, special education services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model for Making Decisions About Text Adaptations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/10534512020380010401
- The paper
- Dyck, N., & Pemberton, J. B. (2002). A Model for Making Decisions About Text Adaptations. Intervention in School and Clinic. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512020380010401
