Cited by 61Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPatient Dignity and Privacy

Probable Reasons for Expressed Agitation in Persons with Dementia

Ragneskog, Hans, Gerdner, Linda A., Josefsson, Karin, Kihlgren, Mona·1998·Clinical Nursing Research

Abstract

Nursing home patients with dementia were videotaped in three previous studies. Sixty sequences of nine patients exhibiting agitated behaviors were examined to identify the most probable antecedents to agitation. Probable reasons were interpreted and applied to the Progressively Lowered Stress Threshold model, which suggests that agitation is stress related. Analysis suggests that agitation often serves as form of communication. Two underlying reasons seem to be that the patient had loss of control over the situation and deficient autonomy. The most common causes for expressed agitation were interpreted as discomfort, a wish to be served immediately, conflict between patients or with nursing staff, reactions to environmental noises or sound, and invasion of personal space. It is recommended that nursing staff promote autonomy and independency for this group of patients whenever possible. By evaluating probable reasons for expressed agitation, the nursing staff can take steps to prevent or alleviate agitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/105477389800700207

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who are deprived of environmental stimuli or activity are at an increased risk for disturbing behaviors.

    “There is strong clinical evidence that individuals who are deprived of environmental stimuli or activity are at an increased risk for disturbing behaviors. 17-22”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ragneskog, H., Gerdner, L. A., Josefsson, K., & Kihlgren, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Örebro University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Clinical Nursing Research
Published
1998-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
189-206
ISSN
  • 1054-7738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3799
OpenAlex
W2101884465
Cited by
61
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
Keywords
dementia, agitation, nursing home residents, loss of control, autonomy, communication, environmental noise, personal space
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Conflict, Psychological, Dementia, Female, Health Facility Environment, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Noise, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Homes, Patient Participation, Personal Space, Psychomotor Agitation, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Videotape Recording, Nursing Methodology Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review