Cited by 94Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Self-Organized Aggregation Triggers Collective Decision Making in a Group of Cockroach-Like Robots

Open access
Garnier, Simon, Gautrais, Jacques, Asadpour, Masoud, Jost, Christian, Theraulaz, Guy·2009·Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

Self-amplification processes are at the origin of several collective decision phenomena in insect societies. Understanding these processes requires linking individual behavioral rules of insects to a choice dynamics at the colony level. In a homogeneous environment, the German cockroach Blattella germanica displays self-amplified aggregation behavior. In a heterogeneous environment where several shelters are present, groups of cockroaches collectively select one of them. In this article, we demonstrate that the restriction of the self-amplified aggregation behavior to distinct zones in the environment can explain the emergence of a collective decision at the level of the group. This hypothesis is tested with robotics experiments and dedicated computer simulations. We show that the collective decision is influenced by the available spaces to explore and to aggregate in, by the size of the population involved in the aggregation process and by the probability of encounter zones while the robots explore the environment. We finally discuss these results from both a biological and a robotics point of view.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059712309103430

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main result of the Swarm-bots project was to demonstrate what-at the present day-remains the only example of self-organized teams of robots that cooperate to solve a complex task, with the robots in the swarm taking different roles over time.

    “The main result of the project was to demonstrate what-at the present day-remains the only example of self-organized teams of robots that cooperate to solve a complex task, with the robots in the swarm taking different roles over time [27].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., & Theraulaz, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, CNRS-UMR 5169, Université Paul Sabatier
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Garnier, Simon
Venue
Adaptive Behavior
Published
2009-03-17
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
109-133
ISSN
  • 1059-7123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2633
OpenAlex
W2097991842
Cited by
94
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
group decision making, Blattella germanica, multi-robot systems, swarm robotics, environmental heterogeneity, shelter selection, population size, exploration, emergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review