Cited by 51Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceCybernetics and Technology in Society

Turing instabilities in biology, culture, and consciousness? On the enactive origins of symbolic material culture

Froese, Tom, Woodward, Alexander, Ikegami, Takashi·2013·Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

It has been argued that the worldwide prevalence of certain types of geometric visual patterns found in prehistoric art can be best explained by the common experience of these patterns as geometric hallucinations during altered states of consciousness induced by shamanic ritual practices. And in turn the worldwide prevalence of these types of hallucinations has been explained by appealing to humanity’s shared neurobiological embodiment. Moreover, it has been proposed that neural network activity can exhibit similar types of spatiotemporal patterns, especially those caused by Turing instabilities under disinhibited, non-ordinary conditions. Altered states of consciousness thus provide a suitable pivot point from which to investigate the complex relationships between symbolic material culture, first-person experience, and neurobiology. We critique prominent theories of these relationships. Drawing inspiration from neurophenomenology, we sketch the beginnings of an alternative, enactive approach centered on the concepts of sense-making, value, and sensorimotor decoupling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1059712313483145

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Area V1, the early visual system, generates the perception of zigzags, lines, lattices, tunnels and dots.

    “Area V1, the early visual system, generates the perception of zigzags, lines, lattices, tunnels and dots (Froese et al., 2013).”

    From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as Froese et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Froese, T., Woodward, A., & Ikegami, T.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Adaptive Behavior
Published
2013-05-16
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
199-214
ISSN
  • 1059-7123 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2633
OpenAlex
W2098152185
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Adaptive Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
Turing instability, prehistoric art, altered states of consciousness, shamanic rituals, enactivism, neurophenomenology, sensemaking, values, embodiment, first-person experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review