The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost of Prescription Drug–Related Morbidity and Mortality
Open accessAbstract
Background: Public attention and recent US Congressional activity has intensified focus on escalating medication prices. However, the actual cost of medication use extends beyond the up-front cost of purchasing medicines. It also encompasses the additional medical costs of morbidity and mortality resulting from nonoptimized medication regimens, including medication nonadherence. Objectives: Applying the most current nationally representative data sources, our goal was to estimate the cost of prescription drug–related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Methods: Total costs of nonoptimized prescription drug use and average pathway costs for a patient who experienced a treatment failure (TF), a new medical problem (NMP), or a TF and NMP were modeled in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) and TreeAge Pro Healthcare, v2014 (TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA), respectively. Results: The estimated annual cost of prescription drug–related morbidity and mortality resulting from nonoptimized medication therapy was $528.4 billion in 2016 US dollars, with a plausible range of $495.3 billion to $672.7 billion. The average cost of an individual experiencing TF, NMP, or TF and NMP after initial prescription use were $2481 (range: $2233, $2742), $2610 (range: $2374, $2848) and $2572 (range: $2408, $2751), respectively. Conclusions: The estimated annual cost of drug-related morbidity and mortality resulting from nonoptimized medication therapy was $528.4 billion, equivalent to 16% of total US health care expenditures in 2016. We propose expansion of comprehensive medication management programs by clinical pharmacists in collaborative practices with physicians and other prescribers as an effective and scalable approach to mitigate these avoidable costs and improve patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Blaha, M. J., Dai, S., Ford, E. S., Fox, C. S., Franco, S., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000442015.53336.12 · Cited by 1,408
Cranor, C. W., Bunting, B. A., & Christensen, D. B. (2003) · Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996) · doi:10.1331/108658003321480713 · Cited by 728
Pharmacists Belong In Accountable Care Organizations And Integrated Care Teams
Smith, M., Bates, D. W., & Bodenheimer, T. S. (2013) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0542 · Cited by 140
Cited by
AI in healthcare: A narrative review
Väänänen, A., Haataja, K., Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K., & Toivanen, P. (2021) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.26997.2 · Cited by 69
Using machine learning to identify adverse drug effects posing increased risk to women
Chandak, P., & Tatonetti, N. P. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100108 · Cited by 51
Tanaka, Y., Chen, H. Y., Belloni, P., Gisladottir, U., Kefeli, J., Patterson, J., Srinivasan, A., Zietz, M., Sirdeshmukh, G., Berkowitz, J., et al. (2025) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2025.100642 · Cited by 17
Sakthong, P., Soipitak, P., & Winit-Watjana, W. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-023-01692-9 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, J. H., McInnis, T., & Hirsch, J. D.
- Venue
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 829-837
- ISSN
- 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
- 1060-0280
- 1542-6270
- OpenAlex
- W2792631875
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost of Prescription Drug–Related Morbidity and Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1060028018765159
- The paper
- Watanabe, J. H., McInnis, T., & Hirsch, J. D. (2018). Cost of Prescription Drug–Related Morbidity and Mortality. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028018765159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.