The Asheville Project: Long-Term Clinical and Economic Outcomes of a Community Pharmacy Diabetes Care Program
Abstract
Objective To assess the persistence of outcomes for up to 5 years following the initiation of community-based pharmaceutical care services (PCS) for patients with diabetes. Design Quasi-experimental, longitudinal pre-post cohort study. Setting Twelve community pharmacies in Asheville, N.C. Patients and other participants Patients with diabetes covered by self-insured employers' health plans. Community pharmacists trained in a diabetes certificate program and reimbursed for PCS. Interventions Education by certified diabetes educators, long-term community pharmacist follow-up using scheduled consultations, clinical assessment, goal setting, monitoring, and collaborative drug therapy management with physicians. Main outcome measures Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) and serum lipid concentrations and changes in diabetes-related and total medical utilization and costs over time. Results Mean A1c decreased at all follow-ups, with more than 50% of patients demonstrating improvements at each time. The number of patients with optimal A1c values (< 7%) also increased at each follow-up. More than 50% showed improvements in lipid levels at every measurement. Multivariate logistic regressions suggested that patients with higher baseline A1c values or higher baseline costs were most likely to improve or have lower costs, respectively. Costs shifted from inpatient and outpatient physician services to prescriptions, which increased significantly at every follow-up. Total mean direct medical costs decreased by $1,200 to $1,872 per patient per year compared with baseline. Days of sick time decreased every year (1997-2001) for one employer group, with estimated increases in productivity estimated at $18,000 annually. Conclusion Patients with diabetes who received ongoing PCS maintained improvement in A1c over time, and employers experienced a decline in mean total direct medical costs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Asheville Project, patients with diabetes had improved outcomes following the initiation of community-based pharmaceutical care services.
“In the Asheville Project, patients with diabetes had improved outcomes following the initiation of communitybased pharmaceutical care services [25].”
From From “retailers” to health care providers: Transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management (2015) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Lau, J., Smith, S. J., Schmid, C. H., & Engelgau, M. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mossialos, E., Courtin, E., Naci, H., Benrimoj, S., Bouvy, M., Farris, K., Noyce, P., & Sketris, I. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.007 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support
Haas, L., Maryniuk, M., Beck, J., Cox, C. E., Duker, P., Edwards, L., Fisher, E. B., Hanson, L., Kent, D., Kolb, L., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s144 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Fazel, M. T., Bagalagel, A., Lee, J. K., Martin, J. R., & Slack, M. K. (2017) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028017711454 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Turner, R. M., Ma, Q., Lorig, K., Greenberg, J., & DeVries, A. R. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9225 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Pharmacists in federally qualified health centers: models of care to improve chronic disease.
Rodis, J. L., Capesius, T. R., Rainey, J. T., Awad, M. H., & Fox, C. H. (2019) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd16.190163 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Magee, M. F., Nassar, C. M., Mete, M. Y., White, K., Youssef, G. A., & Dubin, J. S. (2015) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep15655.or · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cranor, C. W., Bunting, B. A., & Christensen, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cranor, Carole W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996)
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-184
- ISSN
- 1086-5802 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163302849
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 60
- FWCI
- 17.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1996) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- diabetes management, community pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, HbA1c, serum lipids, health care costs, health care utilization, pharmacist follow-up, certified diabetes educator, collaborative drug therapy management, employer-sponsored health insurance, productivity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Community Pharmacy Services, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Pharmacists, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review