Cited by 10Dermatology and Skin DiseasesAsthma and respiratory diseasesPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

Review of Tralokinumab in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Singh, Rohan, Taylor, Alexandra, Shah, Milaan A., Strowd, Lindsay C., Feldman, Steven R.·2023·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Objective To review pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of tralokinumab in treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Data Sources Literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published between January 2010 and May 2022. Study selection and data extraction Articles in English discussing tralokinumab in AD were included. Data synthesis In one phase 2 trial, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 150 and 300 mg achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 0/1 with minimum ≥2 point IGA reduction (23%), versus placebo (11.8%, P = 0.10). During 2 phase 3 trials, more subjects treated with tralokinumab achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 1: 15.8% and ECZTRA 2: 22.2%), versus placebo (7.1% and 10.9%, respectively; P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). During one phase 3 trial, in conjunction with topical corticosteroids (TCS), more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 3: 38.9%), versus placebo (26.2%, P = 0.015). During another phase 3 trial in subjects with resistance or contraindication to oral cyclosporine, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved an Eczema Area Severity Index 75 (64.2%), versus placebo (50.5%, P = 0.018). Relevance to patient care and clinical practice Tralokinumab is efficacious for moderate-to-severe AD, as monotherapy, in conjunction with TCS, and resistance or contraindication to cyclosporine. Although IL-4 and IL-13 are both implicated in AD’s pathogenesis, IL-13 is overexpressed, and head-to-head trials are needed to assess efficacy of tralokinumab, versus dupilumab. Compared with upadacitinib and abrocitinib, tralokinumab is not associated with black-box warnings. Conclusions Tralokinumab is an efficacious and safe systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10600280221105686

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, R., Taylor, A., Shah, M. A., Strowd, L. C., & Feldman, S. R.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Singh, Rohan
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2022-06-22
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
333-340
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W4283325016
Cited by
10
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
tralokinumab, atopic dermatitis, IL-4 receptor alpha inhibition, IL-13, topical corticosteroids, dupilumab, pharmacokinetics, drug safety, moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Dermatitis, Atopic, Dermatologic Agents, Double-Blind Method, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Severity of Illness Index, Cyclosporine, Treatment Outcome, Interleukin-13

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review