Cited by 14Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Two Cases of Therapeutic Failure Associated with Levothyroxine Brand Interchange

Copeland, Paul M·1995·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the loss of therapeutic control in 2 hypothyroid patients and remind clinical pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to remain cognizant of possible product quality differences within or bioequivalency differences between levothyroxine products. CASE SUMMARIES: Two patients with stable hypothyroidism experienced symptoms of hypothyroidism with increased serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations after switching from 1 levothyroxine product to another. One tablet from 1 of the patient's levothyroxine prescriptions was assayed, and its levothyroxine content was 74.5% of the label claim, a value outside of the United States Pharmacopeia requirements of 90-110%. DISCUSSION: Two patients with hypothyroidism had remained euthyroid and stable while receiving 1 levothyroxine product, but became symptomatic with dramatically increased serum TSH concentrations while receiving what were thought to be comparable dosages of another levothyroxine product. Therapeutic control was reestablished in both patients after therapy with the original levothyroxine product was reinstated. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pharmacists and other healthcare professionals should remain cognizant of possible product quality differences within or bioequivalency differences between levothyroxine products. These differences necessitate close monitoring of hypothyroid patients, counseling these patients about the clinical signs of sub- and supratherapeutic levothyroxine dosages, and prudence when switching patients with stable hypothyroidism to alternative levothyroxine products. If there are inconsistencies between levothyroxine products, resultant deleterious effects on the therapeutic stability of patients with hypothyroidism may undermine cost savings that might be incurred by such a change. If these patients are switched to alternative levothyroxine products, it is recommended that thyroid function tests be repeated after equilibration to the new product.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/106002809502900505

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Copeland, P. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Copeland, Paul M
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
1995-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
482-485
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W2465068842
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
levothyroxine, hypothyroidism, bioequivalence, product quality, serum TSH, therapeutic drug monitoring, tablet assay, thyroid function tests, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Therapeutic Equivalency, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Drugs, Generic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review