Cited by 12Technology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilitySocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Designing a Technology Coach

Open access
Rogers, Wendy A., Essa, Irfan A., Fisk, Arthur D.·2007·Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications

Abstract

Technology in the home environment has the potential to support older adults in a variety of ways. We took an interdisciplinary approach (human factors/ergonomics and computer science) to develop a technology "coach" that could support older adults in learning to use a medical device. Our system provided a computer vision system to track the use of a blood glucose meter and provide users with feedback if they made an error. This research could support the development of an in-home personal assistant to coach individuals in a variety of tasks necessary for independent living.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/106480460701500303

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The technology coach was successful in supporting immediate performance and learning, assessed via 2-day retention, with success indexed by participants' ability to correct errors after feedback from the coach.

    “The technology coach was successful in supporting immediate performance and learning (assessed via 2 day retention); success was indexed by participants' ability to correct errors after feedback from the coach.”

    From Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults (2010) · cites this paper as Rogers, Essa, & Fisk, 2007

  • The specificity of feedback influenced the success of the coach-nonspecific information (an error has occurred) yielded worse performance than either specific procedure feedback (turn the test strip over) or specific conceptual feedback (the pink side must face up).

    “the specifi city of feedback infl uenced the success of the coach -non specifi c information (an error has occurred) yielded worse performance than either specifi c procedure feedback (turn the test strip over) or even specifi c conceptual feedback (the pink side must face up).”

    From Toward a Psychological Science of Advanced Technology Design for Older Adults (2010) · cites this paper as Rogers, Essa, & Fisk, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McLaughlin AC, Rogers WA, Fisk AD, Essa I. Designing a technology coach for older adults. Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2005. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, W. A., Essa, I. A., & Fisk, A. D.
Venue
Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications
Published
2007-07
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
17-23
ISSN
1064-8046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168419275
Cited by
12
References
18
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0121661)
  • National Institutes of Health (P01 AG17211)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
older adults, assistive technology, blood glucose meters, computer vision, feedback, independent living, medical device use, human factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review