Cited by 11Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesHigher Education and Employability

Family Career Genograms: Beginning Life Design With Exploratory Students

Storlie, Cassandra A., Lara Hilton, Tracy M., McKinney, Robert, Unger, Dana·2019·The Family Journal

Abstract

Sixteen exploratory college students participated in in-depth interviews exploring their family career genograms. Through the use of constant comparison method, five salient themes emerged from the qualitative interviews. Important insights affecting college students with undeclared majors are provided to inform family counseling and family-oriented career practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1066480718819866

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storlie, C. A., Lara Hilton, T. M., McKinney, R., & Unger, D.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
  • Gonzaga University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Pembroke (US)
Corresponding author
Storlie, Cassandra A.
Venue
The Family Journal
Published
2018-12-13
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
84-91
ISSN
  • 1066-4807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3950
OpenAlex
W2904270164
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Family Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
career development, university students, undeclared majors, family counseling, life design, family history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review