Cited by 494Leadership and Management in OrganizationsWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipEmployee Performance and Leadership

Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons

Smith, Brien N., Montagno, Ray V., Kuzmenko, Tatiana N.·2004·Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine conceptual similarities of transformational and servant leadership theories and analyze the contribution both theories make to the understanding of leadership. The paper examines the extent the domains of the two theories overlap, and looks at the motivation of managers to create organizational cultures using one or the other perspectives. It is suggested that servant leadership leads to a spiritual generative culture, while transformational leadership leads to an empowered dynamic culture. The paper also addresses contextual factors which might make one or the other models more appropriate for organizational objectives. It is suggested that high change environments require the empowered dynamic culture of transformational leadership, while more static environments are better served by the servant leadership culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/107179190401000406

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both servant and spiritual leadership include either explicit or implicit recognition of the role of leader self-awareness/regulation.

    “Like authentic leadership, both servant and spiritual leadership include either explicit or implicit recognition of the role of leader self-awareness/regulation.”

    From Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership (2005) · cites this paper as Smith, Montagno, & Kuzmenko, 2004

  • Prevailing theories of servant leadership include discussions of leader awareness, empathy, conceptualization, and foresight (vision).

    “For example, prevailing theories of servant leadership (e.g., Greenleaf, 1977; Smith, Montagno, & Kuzmenko, 2004; Spears, 1995, 1998; Spears, Lawrence, & Blanchard, 2001) include discussions of leader awareness, empathy, conceptualization, and foresight (vision).”

    From Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership (2005) · cites this paper as Smith, Montagno, & Kuzmenko, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, B. N., Montagno, R. V., & Kuzmenko, T. N.
Affiliations
Ball State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Published
2004-05
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
80-91
ISSN
  • 1548-0518 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-7089
OpenAlex
W2157055974
Cited by
494
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
32.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
transformational leadership, servant leadership, organizational culture, organizational change, managerial motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review