The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust and the Relationship Between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China
Abstract
This study provides a cross-cultural comparison of the mediating effects of trust in the leader on the relationship between the in-role performance of followers (as rated by their leaders) and two types of leadership: transactional and transformational. Participants were 119 full-time Australian followers and 122 full-time Chinese followers. Australian followers reported higher levels of trust in their leaders than did Chinese followers. Culture moderated the mediation effects of trust on the leadership-performance relationship. The findings highlight the need to consider the cultural context within which leadership occurs when attempting to understand mediated relationships with performance outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Process Analysis: Estimating Mediation in Treatment Evaluations
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8100500502 · Cited by 2,442
Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust
Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259297 · Cited by 1,844
Cited by
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601111401017 · Cited by 1,315
Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006 · Cited by 839
Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance
Chen, X.-P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T.-J., Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311410604 · Cited by 555
Liu, J., Siu, O., & Shi, K. (2010) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00407.x · Cited by 435
Miao, Q., Newman, A., & Huang, X. (2014) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.934890 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Casimir, G., Waldman, D. A., Bartram, T., & Yang, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 68-84
- ISSN
- 1548-0518 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-7089
- OpenAlex
- W1974257540
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust and the Relationship Between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/107179190601200305
- The paper
- Casimir, G., Waldman, D. A., Bartram, T., & Yang, S. (2006). Trust and the Relationship Between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190601200305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
