The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology
Abstract
This article contributes to a more reflexive mode of research on public engagement with science-related issues through presenting an in-depth qualitative study of the actors that mediate science-society interactions, their roles and relationships, and the nature of learning and reflexivity in relation to public dialogue. A mapping framework is developed to describe the roles and relations of actors mediating public dialogue on science and technology in Britain. Learning within public dialogue networks is shown to be instrumental only, crowding out potentials for reflexive and relational learning. This calls for renewed critical social science research alongside more deliberately reflexive learning relating to participatory governance of science and technology that is situated, interactive, public, and anticipatory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transformative learning: Theory to practice
Mezirow, J. (1997) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.7401 · Cited by 4,445
Cited by
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
(2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203483794 · Cited by 269
Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation
Stahl, B. C., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2016) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018 · Cited by 235
Public engagement with marine climate change issues: (Re)framings, understandings and responses
Chilvers, J., Lorenzoni, I., Terry, G., Buckley, P., Pinnegar, J. K., & Gelcich, S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.006 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chilvers, J.
- Venue
- Science Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-310
- ISSN
- 0164-0259 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-5470
- 1552-8545
- OpenAlex
- W2137778770
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1075547012454598
- The paper
- Chilvers, J. (2013). Reflexive Engagement? Actors, Learning, and Reflexivity in Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. Science Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012454598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.