Cited by 154Community Health and DevelopmentInterprofessional Education and CollaborationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Sustainability of Collaborative Capacity in Community Health Partnerships

Alexander, Jeffrey A., Weiner, Bryan J., Metzger, Maureen E., Shortell, Stephen M., Bazzoli, Gloria J., Hasnain-Wynia, Romana, Sofaer, Shoshanna, Conrad, Douglas A.·2003·Medical Care Research and Review

Abstract

Sustainability is a key requirement for partnership success and a major challenge for such organizations. Despite the critical importance of sustainability to the success of community health partnerships and the many threats to sustainability, there is little evidence that would provide partnerships with clear guidance on long-term viability. This article attempts to (1) develop a conceptual model of sustainability in community health partnerships and (2) identify potential determinants of sustainability using comparative qualitative data from four partnerships from the Community Care Network (CCN) Demonstration Program. Based on a grounded theory examination of qualitative data from the CCNevaluation, the authors hypothesize that there are five primary attributes/ activities of partnerships leading to consequential value and eventually to sustainability of collaborative capacity. They include outcomes-based advocacy, vision-focus balance, systems orientation, infrastructure development, and community linkages. The context in which the partnership operates provides the conditions for determining the appropriateness and relative impact of each of the factors related to creating consequential value in the partnership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077558703259069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 154

Authors
Alexander, J. A., Weiner, B. J., Metzger, M. E., Shortell, S. M., Bazzoli, G. J., Hasnain-Wynia, R., Sofaer, S., & Conrad, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Health Research and Educational Trust
  • Baruch College (US)
  • Department of Health Services and Dental Public Health Services
Venue
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2003-12
Volume
60
Issue
4_suppl
Pages
130S-160S
ISSN
  • 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6801
OpenAlex
W2148488633
Cited by
154
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care Research and Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
sustainability, community health partnerships, collaborative capacity, conceptual model, infrastructure development, community linkages
MeSH terms
Interinstitutional Relations, Organizational Objectives, United States, Organizational Culture, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Models, Organizational, Community Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review