The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers
Abstract
Much effort has been put into improving measures of health care quality. Although early research suggested that consumers made little use of quality reports, most reports were based on nonstandardized measures and were not user friendly. Information presentation approaches, however, will have a significant influence on what information is attended and used. The present research examines whether information presentation methods differentially influence consumers who differ in numeric skills. Results of three studies support the idea that “less is more” when presenting consumers with comparative performance information to make hospital choices. Results were particularly strong for those lower in numeracy, who had higher comprehension and made better choices when the information-presentation format was designed to ease the cognitive burden and highlight the meaning of important information. These findings have important implications for the sponsors of comparative quality reports designed to inform consumer decision making in health care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x · Cited by 1,180
Self-citation
Cited by
Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care
Epstein, R. M., Fiscella, K., Lesser, C. S., & Stange, K. C. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888 · Cited by 866
Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review
Victoor, A., Delnoij, D. M., Friele, R. D., & Rademakers, J. J. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-272 · Cited by 499
Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011 · Cited by 481
Medication adherence: a call for action
Bosworth, H. B., Granger, B. B., Mendys, P., Brindis, R., Burkholder, R., Czajkowski, S. M., Daniel, J. G., Ekman, I., Ho, M., Johnson, M., et al. (2011) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.007 · Cited by 448
Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice
Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I., & Peters, E. (2008) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K.
- Venue
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-190
- ISSN
- 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6801
- OpenAlex
- W2143846209
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/10775587070640020301
- The paper
- Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Less Is More in Presenting Quality Information to Consumers. Medical Care Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587070640020301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.