Cited by 229Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Report of the APSAC Task Force on Attachment Therapy, Reactive Attachment Disorder, and Attachment Problems

Chaffin, Mark, Hanson, Rochelle, Saunders, Benjamin E., Nichols, Todd, Barnett, Douglas, Zeanah, Charles, Berliner, Lucy, Egeland, Byron +4 more·2006·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Although the term attachment disorder is ambiguous, attachment therapies are increasingly used with children who are maltreated, particularly those in foster care or adoptive homes. Some children described as having attachment disorders show extreme disturbances. The needs of these children and their caretakers are real. How to meet their needs is less clear. A number of attachment-based treatment and parenting approaches purport to help children described as attachment disordered. Attachment therapy is a young and diverse field, and the benefits and risks of many treatments remain scientifically undetermined. Controversies have arisen about potentially harmful attachment therapy techniques used by a subset of attachment therapists. In this report, the Task Force reviews the controversy and makes recommendations for assessment, treatment, and practices. The report reflects American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children's (APSAC) position and also was endorsed by the American Psychological Association's Division 37 and the Division 37 Section on Child Maltreatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559505283699

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaffin, M., Hanson, R., Saunders, B. E., Nichols, T., Barnett, D., Zeanah, C., Berliner, L., Egeland, B., Newman, E., Lyon, T., Letourneau, E., & Miller-Perrin, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Family Attachment Counseling Center
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Harborview Medical Center (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Tulsa (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Pepperdine University
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2006-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
76-89
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2169999660
Cited by
229
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
20.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, attachment problems, foster care, adoptive families, parenting methods, treatment risks and benefits, child abuse
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Psychological Theory, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review