Cited by 220Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Parental Substance Use Disorders and Child Maltreatment: Overlap, Gaps, and Opportunities

Young, Nancy K., Boles, Sharon M., Otero, Cathleen·2007·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

There are relatively few empirically sound studies or nationally representative data on the number of children in Child Welfare Services (CWS) who are affected by their parents' substance abuse or dependence. The two systems that could systematically monitor this population, CWS and substance abuse treatment, are not required to capture the data elements that would identify families in both systems. The studies that are based on CWS populations or parents in treatment indicate that there is a substantial overlap in client populations. This review provides a summary of the available data; provides estimates of the overlap between populations, including the number of infants born each year with prenatal substance exposure; and suggests important opportunities to close the data gap between the systems. The findings underscore both the need for obtaining accurate data within the systems and the opportunities for states to improve their cross-system data efforts as part of their outcome monitoring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559507300322

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor coordination between child welfare agencies and substance abuse treatment providers has hindered the creation of evidence-based programs for this population.

    “Unfortunately, lack of integration between child welfare services and substance abuse treatment providers has restricted the development of evidence-based programming for this group (Young, Boles, & Otero, 2007).”

    From A controlled evaluation of family behavior therapy in concurrent child neglect and drug abuse. (2014) · cites this paper as Young, Boles, & Otero, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, N. K., Boles, S. M., & Otero, C.
Affiliations
  • Children and Family Futures,
  • Children and Family Futures
Corresponding author
Young, Nancy K.
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2007-05
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
137-149
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2042881614
Cited by
220
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
21.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
parental substance use disorder, child welfare services, addiction treatment, prenatal drug exposure, infants, outcome monitoring, child welfare caseloads
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Humans, Parents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Child of Impaired Parents, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review