Cited by 45Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Related Trauma

Ethnic/Racial Differences in the Prevalence of Injurious Spanking and Other Child Physical Abuse in a National Survey of Adolescents

Oscea Hawkins, Alesia, Kmett Danielson, Carla, de Arellano, Michael A., Hanson, Rochelle F., Ruggiero, Kenneth J., Smith, Daniel W., Saunders, Benjamin E., Kilpatrick, Dean G.·2010·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Limited research has examined whether similar patterns in injurious spanking and other forms of child physical abuse (CPA) exist across specific ethnic/racial groups. The authors examined and compared differences in the lifetime prevalence of injurious spanking and CPA in two national samples of adolescents across ethnic/racial groups and over time. Participants were 4,023 youth (12—17 years) and 3,614 youth (12—17 years) who participated in the 1995 National Survey of Adolescents (NSA) and 2005 National Survey of Adolescents—Replication (NSA-R), respectively. Adolescents, who were identified through random digit dial procedures, completed a telephone interview assessment. Results indicated significant ethnic/racial variation across groups in reports of injurious spanking in the NSA and the NSA-R samples; however, significant differences were not observed within groups between the two samples over time. Ethnic/racial differences also were found between groups in reports of CPA in the NSA-R sample. Limitations and future directions of this research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559510367938

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oscea Hawkins, A., Kmett Danielson, C., de Arellano, M. A., Hanson, R. F., Ruggiero, K. J., Smith, D. W., Saunders, B. E., & Kilpatrick, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine at Rockford, University of Illinois, Rockford, Illinois,
  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2010-05-24
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
242-249
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2055198356
Cited by
45
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA018686)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD046830)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
child physical abuse, racial and ethnic differences, adolescents, lifetime prevalence, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asian, Black or African American, Child Abuse, Ethnicity, Health Surveys, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Indians, North American, Punishment, United States, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, White People, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review