Cited by 59Child Welfare and AdoptionLegal and Social Justice StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Effects of a Multidisciplinary Family Treatment Drug Court on Child and Family Outcomes: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study

Bruns, Eric J., Pullmann, Michael D., Weathers, Ericka S., Wirschem, Mark L., Murphy, Jill K.·2012·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) are an increasingly common approach for serving families involved in child welfare due to parental substance abuse; however, the evidence base for FTDCs remains emergent. This quasi-experimental study replicates previous research on FTDCs by comparing parental substance abuse treatment and child welfare outcomes for 76 FTDC participants to outcomes for 76 parents in the same system who did not participate in the FTDC, using propensity score matching. Data were obtained from the Superior court, FTDC, child welfare, and public substance use treatment service administrative databases. The follow-up window for participants ranged from 1 to 3 years. Results showed FTDC parents had significantly more review and motion hearings, were significantly more likely to enter treatment, entered treatment faster, received more treatment, and were more likely to successfully complete treatment. FTDC children spent significantly less time placed out of home, ended child welfare system involvement sooner, were more likely to be permanently placed and discharged from child welfare, and were more likely to return to parental care. Results demonstrate that FTDCs promote positive treatment and child welfare outcomes without deepening participants’ involvement in justice systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559512454216

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research indicates that specialized drug courts yield positive results for entire families.

    “Specialized drug courts have been shown to produce favorable outcomes for the whole family (Burns, Pullman, Weathers, Wirschem, & Murphy, 2012).”

    From The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice (2013) · cites this paper as Burns, Pullman, Weathers, Wirschem, & Murphy, 2012

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 59

Authors
Bruns, E. J., Pullmann, M. D., Weathers, E. S., Wirschem, M. L., & Murphy, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Seattle Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Bruns, Eric J.
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
2012-08
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
218-230
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2032678324
Cited by
59
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
parental substance use, child welfare, addiction treatment, multidisciplinary treatment, out-of-home placement, permanent placement, court-ordered treatment, treatment completion
MeSH terms
Child, Child Welfare, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parents, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review