Effects of a Multidisciplinary Family Treatment Drug Court on Child and Family Outcomes: Results of a Quasi-Experimental Study
Abstract
Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) are an increasingly common approach for serving families involved in child welfare due to parental substance abuse; however, the evidence base for FTDCs remains emergent. This quasi-experimental study replicates previous research on FTDCs by comparing parental substance abuse treatment and child welfare outcomes for 76 FTDC participants to outcomes for 76 parents in the same system who did not participate in the FTDC, using propensity score matching. Data were obtained from the Superior court, FTDC, child welfare, and public substance use treatment service administrative databases. The follow-up window for participants ranged from 1 to 3 years. Results showed FTDC parents had significantly more review and motion hearings, were significantly more likely to enter treatment, entered treatment faster, received more treatment, and were more likely to successfully complete treatment. FTDC children spent significantly less time placed out of home, ended child welfare system involvement sooner, were more likely to be permanently placed and discharged from child welfare, and were more likely to return to parental care. Results demonstrate that FTDCs promote positive treatment and child welfare outcomes without deepening participants’ involvement in justice systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research indicates that specialized drug courts yield positive results for entire families.
“Specialized drug courts have been shown to produce favorable outcomes for the whole family (Burns, Pullman, Weathers, Wirschem, & Murphy, 2012).”
From The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice (2013) · cites this paper as Burns, Pullman, Weathers, Wirschem, & Murphy, 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Bruns, E. J., Pullmann, M. D., Weathers, E. S., Wirschem, M. L., & Murphy, J. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Seattle Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bruns, Eric J.
- Venue
- Child Maltreatment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 218-230
- ISSN
- 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6119
- OpenAlex
- W2032678324
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- parental substance use, child welfare, addiction treatment, multidisciplinary treatment, out-of-home placement, permanent placement, court-ordered treatment, treatment completion
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Welfare, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parents, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review