The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility
Abstract
People increasingly rely on Internet and web-based information despite evidence that it is potentially inaccurate and biased. Therefore, this study sought to assess people's perceptions of the credibility of various categories of Internet information compared to similar information provided by other media. The 1,041 respondents also were asked about whether they verified Internet information. Overall, respondents reported they considered Internet information to be as credible as that obtained from television, radio, and magazines, but not as credible as newspaper information. Credibility among the types of information sought, such as news and entertainment, varied across media channels. Respondents said they rarely verified web-based information, although this too varied by the type of information sought. Levels of experience and how respondents perceived the credibility of information were related to whether they verified information. This study explores the social relevance of the findings and discusses them in terms of theoretical knowledge of advanced communication technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x · Cited by 1,394
Self-citationMetzger, M. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20672 · Cited by 871
Self-citationHilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001 · Cited by 611
Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks
Ciampaglia, G. L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L. M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128193 · Cited by 486
College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(03)00049-6 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J.
- Venue
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 515-540
- ISSN
- 1077-6990 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-430X
- OpenAlex
- W2137194788
- Cited by
- 1,069
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/107769900007700304
- The paper
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.