The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers
Abstract
This article locates grounded theory in its national, historical, and disciplinary origins and explores how and to what extent these origins affect research practice across the globe. The article begins a conversation with international researchers who review using grounded theory in their countries and cultures. Their reviews reveal the significance of (a) shared meanings, (b) contradictions between data collection techniques and cultural practices, (c) tensions between coding in English and native languages, (d) points of cultural convergence and grounded theory strategies, and (e) local constraints. In conclusion, the article calls for attending to how the national and cultural underpinnings of methodological approaches affect inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2024) · Foundational Concepts of Decolonial and Southern Epistemologies · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,810
Handbook of qualitative research
Griffin, T. F. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199907)16:4<371::aid-mar7>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 9,037
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · The Discovery of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4324/9780203793206-1 · Cited by 8,344
Derrida, J. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203991787 · Cited by 7,492
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Hall, T. D., & Smith, L. T. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2653993 · Cited by 7,420
Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Brink, E., Dellve, L., Hallberg, U., Abrahamsson, K. H., Klingberg, G., & Wentz, K. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v1i3.4932 · Cited by 6,862
From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not
Suddaby, R. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020 · Cited by 2,859 · cited 1×
“Yes, where grounded theorists draw the lines matters, but the lines need not be rigid and inflexible (see Suddaby, 2006, for one viewpoint).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.4135/9781848607958.n23 · doi:10.4135/9781848607958.n23
- 10.4135/9781848607941.n25 · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n25
- Kotter J. P., 2010, Matsushita leadership
- 10.1086/224572 · doi:10.1086/224572
- McMahon M. S., 1994, The sixties: From memory to history, 45
- 10.1016/S0163-2396(08)32009-2 · doi:10.1016/s0163-2396(08)32009-2
- Strauss A., 1969, American Journal of Sociology, 74, 419, 10.1086/224666 · doi:10.1086/224666
- Strübing J., 2005, Pragmatistische Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Theorie und Methode
Cited by
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017) · Qualitative Psychology · doi:10.1037/qup0000082 · Cited by 851
Special Invited Paper: Continuities, Contradictions, and Critical Inquiry in Grounded Theory
Charmaz, K. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406917719350 · Cited by 214
Self-citationSetty, E. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0957-x · Cited by 75
Examining grounded theory through the lens of rationalist epistemology
Albert, M., Mylopoulos, M., & Laberge, S. (2019) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9849-7 · Cited by 31
“As Charmaz stresses, this “prior knowledge,” if not “scrutinised,” “dissected,” and “assessed” with “critical skepticism,” could be an impediment to “thinking afresh” and looking at “studied life from multiple vantage points” (Charmaz 2014a, p. 244).”
BackgroundThe experiences of daily smartphone use among older adults in Brazil: A grounded theory analysis
Gallo, A. M., Laranjeira, C., Araújo, J. P., Marques, F. R. D. M., Baccon, W. C., Salci, M. A., & Carreira, L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35120 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Charmaz, K.
- Venue
- Qualitative Inquiry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-28
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1074-1084
- ISSN
- 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7565
- OpenAlex
- W2045647466
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 42.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1077800414545235
- The paper
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414545235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
