Cited by 851Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: promoting methodological integrity

Levitt, Heidi M., Motulsky, Sue L., Wertz, Fredrick J., Morrow, Susan L., Ponterotto, Joseph G.·2017·Qualitative Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/qup0000082

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • Lesley University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
Venue
Qualitative Psychology
Published
2017-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2-22
ISSN
  • 2326-3598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-3601
OpenAlex
W2556869215
Cited by
851
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 9
FWCI
181.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
qualitative research design, methodological integrity, research methodology guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review