The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gendering Coercive Control
Abstract
This article examines the theory of gender presented in Stark's Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Stark suggests that gender is a form of structural inequality that makes women more vulnerable than men to the strategies of coercive control. However, Stark assumes rather than demonstrates that gendered structural inequality increases women's vulnerability. In this article, the author applies the multilevel theory of gender as identity, interaction, and social structure to document the multiple ways coercive control is gendered. The author argues that, to understand the gender dynamics of coercive control, researchers must examine the interactions across levels of gender. The author concludes with an assessment of the prospects and pitfalls of applying the concept of coercive control to renew the feminist social movement to end domestic violence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As noted earlier, coercive and controlling tactics “work” to establish domination only to the extent that they reflect a power imbalance in the relationship supported by existing social structures (Anderson, 2009; Ashcroft, 2000; Dutton & Goodman, 2005; Stark, 2007).”
From Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS) (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson, 2009
In the citing paper
“For example, in heterosexual relationships, patriarchal social structures, gendered role expectations, and stereotypes about women make it easier for men to establish a regime of control than the other way around.”
From Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS) (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson, 2009
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M., & Butler, J. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.2307/1395391 · Cited by 29,314
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Chodorow, N. J. (1978) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520924086 · Cited by 4,457
The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender
Giles-Sims, J., & Chodorow, N. J. (1979) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351719 · Cited by 3,178
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
Patriarchal Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: Two Forms of Violence against Women
Johnson, M. P. (1995) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353683 · Cited by 2,218
Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265269 · Cited by 1,823
The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination
Benjamin, J. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,662
Coercive Control: The Entrapment Of Women In Personal Life
Stark, E. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195154276.001.0001 · Cited by 1,502
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Connell, R.W., 1995, Masculinities
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sweet, P. L. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122419874843 · Cited by 643
The Abuse of Technology in Domestic Violence and Stalking
Woodlock, D. (2016) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216646277 · Cited by 413
Coercive Control in Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence
Frankland, A., & Brown, J. (2013) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9558-1 · Cited by 121
Scarduzio, J. A., Carlyle, K. E., Harris, K. L., & Savage, M. W. (2016) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216636240 · Cited by 109
Nonfatal Strangulation as Part of Domestic Violence: A Review of Research
Pritchard, A., Reckdenwald, A., & Nordham, C. J. (2017) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838015622439 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, K. L.
- Affiliations
- Western Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Anderson, Kristin L.
- ORCID
- Anderson, Kristin L.
- Venue
- Violence Against Women
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1444-1457
- ISSN
- 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8448
- OpenAlex
- W2101712371
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- coercive control, gender theory, structural inequality, women's vulnerability, gender identity, gender interaction, social structure, domestic violence
- MeSH terms
- Coercion, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Power, Psychological, Women's Rights, Domestic Violence, Battered Women, Feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
