Cited by 20Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Understanding Self-Harm in Victims of Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Analysis of Calls Made by Victims to a Crisis Hotline in China

Wong, Susan P. Y., Cuiling Wang, Mei Meng, Phillips, Michael R.·2011·Violence Against Women

Abstract

Text analysis of the transcripts of 26 calls made to a Chinese crisis hotline by victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) reporting thoughts or acts of self-harm abstracted information on victims' patterns of self-harm and the relationship of their self-harm to IPV. Specific violent episodes often triggered self-harm. Victims considered self-harm a method for airing painful emotions caused by abuse or as a last resort to escape by dying when they saw no other options and were no longer able to endure the violence. We also elaborate on callers' discussions of barriers to accessing support, sociocultural pressures to preserve "face" and family, and restrictive gender roles that contribute to their self-harm behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801211404549

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intimate partner violence is associated with self-harm in women.

    “IPV was associated with a range of mental health issues including depression, PTSD, anxiety, self-harm, and sleep disorders.”
  • A qualitative study of self-harm in victims of intimate partner violence in China revealed that victims considered self-harm to be a method for airing painful emotions caused by abuse, or a last resort to escape by dying when they saw no other option and were no longer able to endure the violence.

    “A qualitative study of self-harm in victims of intimate partner violence in China [62] revealed that victims considered self-harm to be a method for airing painful emotions caused by abuse, or a last resort to escape by dying when they saw no other option and were no longer able to endure the violence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, S. P. Y., Wang, C., Meng, M., & Phillips, M. R.
Affiliations
Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital (CN)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2011-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
532-544
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2157463889
Cited by
20
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ford Foundation
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
self-harm, intimate partner violence, help-seeking barriers, face preservation, gender roles, sociocultural pressure, emotional coping, China
MeSH terms
China, Culture, Emotions, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Sexual Partners, Social Support, Spouse Abuse, Stress, Psychological, Hotlines, Self-Injurious Behavior, Battered Women, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review