Upzoning chicago: impacts of a zoning reform on property values and housing construction:
Abstract
What are the local-level impacts of zoning change? I study recent Chicago upzonings that increased allowed densities and reduced parking requirements in a manner exogenous of development plans and neighborhood characteristics. To evaluate outcomes, I use difference-in-differences tests on property transaction prices and housing-unit construction permits. I detect significant, robust increases in values for transactions on parcels that received a boost in allowed building size. I also identify value increases for residential condominiums, indicating that upzoning increased prices of existing housing units. I find no impacts of the reforms, however, on the number of newly permitted dwellings over five years. As such, I demonstrate that the short-term, local-level impacts of upzoning are higher property prices but no additional new housing construction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Freemark (2019) found that transit-oriented upzoning in Chicago failed to encourage construction.
“For example, Freemark (2019) found that transit-oriented upzoning in Chicago failed to encourage construction”
From The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (2023) · cites this paper as Freemark, 2019
Recent studies show that zoning reforms have not had a substantial impact on housing construction.
“recent studies that show that zoning reforms have not had a substantial impact on housing construction (Freemark, 2019; Limb and Murray, 2022)”
From The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland (2023) · cites this paper as Freemark, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of upzoning on housing construction in Auckland
Greenaway-McGrevy, R., & Phillips, P. C. B. (2023) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2023.103555 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The heterogeneous impacts of widespread upzoning: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand
Cheung, K. S., Monkkonen, P., & Yiu, C. Y. (2024) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980231190281 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Can zoning reform change urban development patterns? Evidence from Auckland
Greenaway-McGrevy, R., & Jones, J. A. (2025) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980241311521 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland
Greenaway‐McGrevy, R., & So, Y. (2026) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.70075
- Authors
- Freemark, Y.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freemark, Yonah
- ORCID
- Freemark, Yonah
- Venue
- Urban Affairs Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-01-29
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 758-789
- ISSN
- 1078-0874 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8332
- OpenAlex
- W2913009089
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 14.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Urban Affairs Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Valuation
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Keywords
- upzoning, zoning reform, property values, housing construction, building density, parking requirements, residential condominiums, housing permits, Chicago
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review