Cited by 0Housing Market and EconomicsUrban and Rural Development ChallengesRegional Economics and Spatial Analysis

Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland

Open access
Greenaway‐McGrevy, Ryan, So, Yun·2026·Economic Inquiry

Abstract

Zoning reform is increasingly advocated to redress unaffordable housing, but few real‐world examples demonstrate its efficacy. However, Auckland recently upzoned approximately three‐quarters of its residential land, precipitating a housing construction boom. We investigate whether the reform reduced housing costs, adopting a synthetic control method to estimate rental prices in Auckland under the counterfactual of no zoning change. Eight years after the reform, the synthetic control under our preferred empirical specification implies that rents decreased by 23% due to the reform. These findings are robust across a range of specifications and support the proposition that widespread upzoning can enhance housing affordability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ecin.70075

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Been V., 2018, City NIMBYs, Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 33, 217
  2. Glaeser E. L., 2003, The impact of building restrictions on housing affordability, Economic Policy Review, 9, 21
  3. Greenaway‐McGrevy R., 2026, ECIN replication package for “Can zoning reform reduce housing costs? Evidence from rents in Auckland”
  4. Hamilton E., 2021, Inclusionary zoning and housing market outcomes, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 23, 161
  5. Hamilton E., 2021, Regulation and economic opportunity, 186
  6. Huennekens J. W., 2023, Learning from land use reforms: the case of Ramapo, New York, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 25, 225
  7. Johnson A., 2018, A stocktake of New Zealand’s housing
  8. Krimmel J., 2023, Upzoning with strings attached evidence from Seattle’s affordable housing mandate, Cityscape, 25, 257
  9. Maré D. C., 2012, Residential sorting across Auckland neighbourhoods, New Zealand Population Review, 38, 23
  10. Paton D., 2013, Preparing for disaster: building household and community capacity
  11. Schill M. H., 2005, Regulations and housing development: what we know, Cityscape, 8, 5
  12. Wegmann J., 2023, Here come the tall skinny houses: assessing single‐family Houston, 2007 – 2020, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 25, 171

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Greenaway‐McGrevy, R., & So, Y.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Economic Inquiry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-07-11
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
1393-1433
ISSN
  • 0043-3640 (ISSN-L)
  • 0095-2583
  • 1465-7295
OpenAlex
W7168104775
Cited by
0
References
44
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Economic Inquiry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Royal Society Te Apārangi (UOA2013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
zoning reform, upzoning, housing affordability, rental prices, housing costs, Auckland, residential land use, housing construction, counterfactual analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review