Cited by 340Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Motivation-Facilitation Model of Sexual Offending

Seto, Michael C.·2019·Sexual Abuse

Abstract

In this article, I describe the motivation-facilitation model of sexual offending, which identifies the traits of paraphilia, high sex drive, and intense mating effort as primary motivations for sexual offenses, as well as trait (e.g., antisocial personality) and state (e.g., intoxication) factors that can facilitate acting on these motivations when opportunities exist. Originally developed to explain contact sexual offending against children, the motivation-facilitation model was subsequently extended as an explanation for child pornography offending and for online solicitations of young adolescents. Here, I argue it has the potential to be expanded to explain other forms of sexual offending, including sexual assaults of adults and noncontact offenses involving exhibitionism or voyeurism. In this review, I critically examine the evidence for and against the model, discuss its limitations, and identify critical gaps for future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1079063217720919

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Clarke R. V. G., Felson M. (Eds.). (1993). Advances in Criminology: Vol. 5. Routine activity and rational choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  2. 10.1023/A:1009562312658 · DOI
  3. Hanson R. K., Harris A. J. R., Scott T. L., Helmus L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Research report, Vol. 5(6)). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
  4. Hare R. D. (2003). Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
  5. 10.1023/A:1009536200242 · DOI
  6. Stephens S. M. (2015). Hebephilic sexual interests among sexual offenders. Doctoral dissertation, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Seto, M. C.
Affiliations
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group, Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author
Seto, Michael C.
Venue
Sexual Abuse
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
3-24
ISSN
  • 1079-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-286X
OpenAlex
W2737203213
Cited by
339
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
19.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
sexual offending, paraphilias, sexual desire, mating effort, antisocial personality, poisoning, child sexual abuse, exhibitionism, voyeurism, adult sexual assault
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Humans, Libido, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Pedophilia, Risk Factors, Sex Offenses, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review