Cited by 67Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Evaluation of a Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program

Chasan-Taber, Lisa, Tabachnick, Joan·1999·Sexual Abuse

Abstract

A half-million children are believed to be sexually abused each year in the United States. In 1995, the American Medical Association declared sexual assault "a silent violent epidemic." The majority of efforts to stop child sexual abuse have focused on punishing abusers and treating victims and their families; prevention programs are uncommon and rely on educating children to report sexual abuse. This case study describes the evaluation of the first public health campaign designed to target adults for prevention. A baseline assessment of attitudes, awareness, knowledge, and policies was conducted in Vermont to identify facilitators and barriers to adult prevention of child sexual abuse. These included predisposing factors (50% of vermont residents did not know the characteristics of an abuser), enabling factors (60% of Vermont residents did not know where to refer someone who may have sexual behavior problems), and reinforcing factors (when focus group participants knew an abuser, they were less likely to take action). This process guided the intervention, which included a broad-based media campaign targeting adults; a one-to-one communications strategy that provided information to agencies working with families at risk and a toll-free helpline for adults in an abuse situation; and a systems change strategy designed to educate decision-makers and leaders. Program evaluation measures included a random-digit dial survey, focus groups, a survey of Vermont decision-makers, and other data sets. The successes and limitations of these interventions, both as strategies in themselves and as data sources for evaluation, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/107906329901100404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chasan-Taber, L., & Tabachnick, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Arnold House, Box 30430, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-0430
  • STOP IT NOW!, P.O. Box 495, Haydenville, Massachusetts 01039
Venue
Sexual Abuse
Published
1999-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
279-292
ISSN
  • 1079-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-286X
OpenAlex
W2146211520
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse prevention, public health campaigns, media campaigns, one-to-one communication, telephone helpline, systemic change, high-risk families, barriers and facilitators, Vermont, program evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Public Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review