Cited by 11Gender Studies and Social IssuesGeography and Education MethodsCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using Feminist Geography to Understand Feelings of Safety and Neighborhood Image

Zavattaro, Staci·2019·Journal of Health and Human Services Administration

Abstract

Healthy neighborhoods come about via a confluence of factors, including but not limited to walkability, public spaces, feelings of safety, sense of community, and neighborhood reputation. While this research set out to understand why people choose their neighborhoods, a deeper pattern emerged related to feelings of safety, especially for women, and neighborhood reputation. This paper uses feminist geography as a critical lens to understand how power relations often exacerbate negative perceptions of safety and, as such, negative perceptions of a neighborhood's community health. Feminist geography as a lens has practical implications based on these findings for how urban planners and administrators design public spaces. Findings are based on a content analysis of interviews with 75 people throughout the U.S. Stories highlight how feelings of safety could affect neighborhood image and reputation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/107937391904200202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1080/026143699375032 · DOI
  2. 10.1057/pb.2010.3 · DOI
  3. 10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990011 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1469540505053093 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00148-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/00380237.1991.10570579 · DOI
  7. Berg B.L., 2001, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences
  8. 10.1177/0013916512453838 · DOI
  9. Chu A., 2004, Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 3, 17
  10. 10.1177/0013916510366821 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/13562570120104382 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/2085629 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/1468794113481790 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0013916506290959 · DOI
  16. 10.1057/palgrave.pb.5990004 · DOI
  17. Gordon M.T., 1980, Signs, 5, S143
  18. 10.1177/107937390703000201 · DOI
  19. Hilinski C.M., 2011, Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 112
  20. 10.1086/339922 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1460331 · DOI
  22. 10.1068/d3308 · DOI
  23. Jacobs J., 1961, The death and life of great American cities.
  24. 10.1057/s41254-017-0091-5 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/pubmed/fds011 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/jech.2005.043562 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/1470593112467268 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/12265934.2002.9693512 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/09663699725369 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/107937390302600104 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0022427800037003003 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/0966369022000024678 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x · DOI
  34. 10.1080/00420987720080321 · DOI
  35. McDowell L., 1999, Gender, identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies.
  36. 10.1080/03098269708725444 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/030913259301700202 · DOI
  38. 10.1068/d010059 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/anti.12078 · DOI
  40. 10.2307/213133 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90014-5 · DOI
  42. Newman O., 1972, Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City.
  43. 10.1002/nur.20259 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/area.12138 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/00420980120046590 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Pain R.H., 1997, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22, 231
  47. 10.1177/030913259101500403 · DOI
  48. 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208513 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/0042098010367860 · DOI
  50. 10.1068/a41262 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s10901-007-9075-8 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.09.003 · DOI
  53. 10.1057/pb.2012.18 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/026143698375196 · DOI
  56. 10.1177/0309132507077091 · DOI
  57. 10.1177/030981680308000103 · DOI
  58. 10.1057/pb.2009.2 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/0042098009357353 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/0013916506292332 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.795 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/0022427884021004003 · DOI
  63. 10.2307/635141 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/BF00893369 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/13604813.2014.939474 · DOI
  66. 10.1080/00420980600597434 · DOI
  67. Valentine G., 1989, The Royal Geographic Society, 21, 385
  68. 10.1177/0042098010396240 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004 · DOI
  70. 10.1177/073491491804200104 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/symb.188 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zavattaro, S.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Zavattaro, Staci
Venue
Journal of Health and Human Services Administration
Published
2019-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
167-256
ISSN
  • 1079-3739 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-5509
OpenAlex
W4396612436
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Health and Human Services Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography and Education Methods
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
feminist geography, sense of security, neighborhood image, neighborhood reputation, women's safety, power relations, neighborhood selection, public space design, community health, sense of community, walkability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review