The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing and Enhancing the Basic Writing Skills of Marketing Students
Abstract
Employers consistently rank communication skills, in particular writing ability, among the most important skills for undergraduate business students to possess. However, improving writing skills, especially with respect to punctuation, grammar, and word choice, often requires substantial teacher time and effort. To assess and improve student writing skills in a time-efficient manner, the authors developed a computer-scored measure of students’ ability to edit for writing mechanics. The authors tested the method with a pretest and posttest design and found that when students were held accountable for improvement (with 5% of the course grade dependent on improvement), there was a significant increase in students’ ability to edit. Without that accountability, improvement did not occur.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several students also made the link between the Grammarly feedback and their grade, which according to Bacon and Anderson (2004) is necessary to stimulate improvements in grammar and punctuation.”
From Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly (2019) · cites this paper as Bacon and Anderson (2004)
Citations
Cites
Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00175.x · Cited by 513 · cited 1×
“A decrease in score might be expected because the process of forgetting begins immediately after learning, and the loss function is steepest in the beginning (following a power curve; Wixted & Ebbesen, 1991).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Beeler, J. D., 2001, Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 2, 48
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper, P. L., 1984, The assessment of writing ability: A review of research
- 10.1177/027347539001200309 · DOI
- 10.1080/10528008.1993.11488419 · DOI
- Nunnally, J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory
- Reichardt, C. S., 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design& analysis issues for field settings, 147
- 10.1177/108056990006300305 · DOI
- Strunk, W., 1979, The elements of style
- Wright, B. D., 1979, Best test design
Cited by
Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly
ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.3795 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacon, D. R., & Anderson, E. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- ORCID
- Bacon, Donald R.
- Venue
- Business Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-454
- ISSN
- 1080-5699 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4191
- OpenAlex
- W2093373677
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Business Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- basic writing skills, marketing students, business communication, writing mechanics, editing, grammar, punctuation, word choice, student accountability, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing and Enhancing the Basic Writing Skills of Marketing Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1080569904271083
- The paper
- Bacon, D. R., & Anderson, E. S. (2004). Assessing and Enhancing the Basic Writing Skills of Marketing Students. Business Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569904271083