The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Theory of Sustainability Management: Uncovering and Integrating the Nearly Obvious
Abstract
The continuing evolution and increasing salience of the concept and practice of sustainability among individuals, organizations, and societies worldwide appears to warrant the development of conceptual approaches to theories of sustainability management for application to management research, education, and practice. While other management theories have been employed by many management scholars to help explain the need for and advancement of sustainability management, none of those theories appear to have the unique features, benefits, opportunities, challenges, or orientations to assist individuals, organizations, and societies to move toward sustainability as much and as soon as appears necessary. However, since the consideration of theories of sustainability management is relatively new for most management scholars, the authors hope this article begins a dialogue among those stakeholders to better describe, develop, and apply this and related theories of sustainability management as significantly, effectively, and urgently as possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?
Mora, C., Tittensor, D. P., Adl, S., Simpson, A. G. B., & Worm, B. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 · Cited by 3,045
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Cited by
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615575176 · Cited by 975
Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026613507931 · Cited by 624
Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective
Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615592930 · Cited by 443
Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective
Rezaee, Z. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003 · Cited by 339
Garcia, S., Cintra, Y., Torres, R. D. C. S. R., & Lima, F. G. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.110 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Starik, M., & Kanashiro, P.
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-28
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-30
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W1965751398
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 90.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Theory of Sustainability Management: Uncovering and Integrating the Nearly Obvious. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1086026612474958
- The paper
- Starik, M., & Kanashiro, P. (2013). Toward a Theory of Sustainability Management: Uncovering and Integrating the Nearly Obvious. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612474958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
