The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Diverse Scaling Strategies of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Renewable Energy Cooperatives
Abstract
This article seeks to shed light on the diversity of scaling strategies of social enterprises, which can be considered as emblematic hybrid organizations. By comparing three Flemish renewable energy cooperatives with contrasted scaling strategies, the article shows how these strategies can be understood in relation to the organizational mission as imprinted at the founding. We extend the notion of hybridity beyond the combination of institutional logics to highlight the interest orientation (mutual vs. general interest). Unlike what is suggested in extant literature, we find that mutual interest orientation may be associated with “scale-up,” business growth strategies, while general interest orientation may lead to less growth-focused “scale-out” and “scale-deep” strategies. The findings illuminate aspects of the hybrid nature of social enterprises by explaining their diverse scaling strategies and extend the notion of imprinting to the interorganizational level by highlighting how social enterprises may collaborate to collectively achieve the pursuit of their multiple missions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It would also enable scale-out and scale-deep strategies (versus scale-up strategies) focused on broadening the diversity of services offered to the same target audience and improving processes to enhance the impact on beneficiaries, respectively, which have been identified as suitable scaling strategies for general interest cooperatives such as REScoops [125].”
From Smart, circular and renewable: The role of cooperative governance in accelerating a sustainable energy transition (2025) · cites this paper as [125]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0431 · Cited by 1,571 · cited 2×
“Nevertheless, these differences are conceptually useful to understand the positioning of social enterprises as hybrid organizations beyond the way in which social and commercial logics are balanced (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 71
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00376.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-014-2445-8 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2010.57318391 · DOI
- 10.5465/19416520.2014.893615 · DOI
- Battilana J., Lee M., Walker J., Dorsey C. (2012, Summer). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/in_search_of_the_hybrid_ideal
- 10.5465/amj.2013.0903 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
- Ben-Ner A., 2000, The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches, 3
- Besharov M. L., 2014, Organization Studies, 39, 364
- 10.1080/19420676.2014.954258 · DOI
- Campi S., 2006, Social enterprise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 29
- 10.1080/08985626.2014.888099 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00071-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-008-9762-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/jsbm.12429 · DOI
- Defourny J., 2006, Social enterprise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 3
- 10.1177/1476127006066596 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420676.2013.871325 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijmr.12028 · DOI
- 10.1108/MD-01-2017-0089 · DOI
- 10.1177/0266242615585152 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2393315 · DOI
- 10.1080/19420676.2013.829116 · DOI
- 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01367.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1086026614545345 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00168.x · DOI
- 10.5840/beq201323440 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203121917 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840617717097 · DOI
- 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1350508416664144 · DOI
- 10.1086/517899 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00374.x · DOI
- 10.1108/17508611211226593 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840615580007 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00115-5 · DOI
- 10.2307/3556640 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.1110.0717 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2010.57318393 · DOI
- 10.5465/19416520.2013.766076 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1100.0633 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1476127016633335 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0007650318758329 · DOI
- Penrose E., 1959, The theory of the growth of the firm
- 10.1007/s10551-010-0584-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/icc/dtr026 · DOI
- 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36 · DOI
- 10.1177/0170840613479226 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206314553276 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10551-014-2447-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/08985626.2010.488405 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00386.x · DOI
- Stinchcombe A. L., 1965, Handbook of organizations, 142
- 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0001839214549042 · DOI
- 10.3917/mana.173.0193 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00194.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00037-1 · DOI
- 10.1177/0266242612457700 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Opstal, W., Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104049 · Cited by 20
Pillai, K. G., Nair, S. R., Zahoor, N., & Khan, Z. (2024) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-024-00547-3 · Cited by 8
“Indeed, research on SEs has considered the importance of social networks across business disciplines (Bauwens et al., 2020; Gillett et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021; Sakarya et al., 2012).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauwens, T., Huybrechts, B., & Dufays, F.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Emlyon Business School, Ecully, France
- KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- ORCID
- Bauwens, Thomas
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-03-20
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-219
- ISSN
- 1086-0266
- 1552-7417
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review


