Cited by 24

The Behavior Education Support and Treatment (BEST) School Intervention Program: Pilot Project Data Examining Schoolwide, Targeted-School, and Targeted-Home Approaches

Waschbusch, Daniel A., Pelham, William E., Massetti, Greta, Northern Partners in Action for Children and Youth·2005·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

As part of a pilot project, four elementary schools were randomly assigned to receive one of four interventions: (a) a schoolwide intervention that incorporated universal and targeted treatment, (b) a targeted-school intervention delivered to individual students in regular and special education classrooms, (c) a targeted-home intervention delivered in home and regular classroom settings, and (d) a control condition that did not receive a designated intervention. Results showed that the behavior of disruptive children in all schools improved during the course of the year, with some evidence that interventions provided complementary effects. These findings support the continued use of behavioral interventions in elementary schools and argue for interventions that combine different methods of delivering interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054705279999

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behaviorally oriented interventions that target self-control have been found to produce positive outcomes.

    “Additional studies report that behaviorally oriented interventions that target self-control have been found to produce positive outcomes (Piquero et al., 2010;Stoltz, Londen, Deković, Castro, & Prinzie, 2012;Waschbusch, Pelham, & Massetti, 2005;Wilson & Lipsey, 2006).”

    From Evaluating the Zones of Regulation® intervention to improve the self-control of elementary students (2020) · cites this paper as Waschbusch, Pelham, & Massetti, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waschbusch, D. A., Pelham, W. E., Massetti, G., & Youth, N. P. I. A. F. C. A.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University, State University of New York at Buffalo,
  • State University of New York at Buffalo
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2005-08
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
313-322
ISSN
  • 1087-0547
  • 1557-1246
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review